Ad is loading...
IBNCX vs RLBEX
IBNCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts IBNCX vs RLBEX
Macquarie Balanced Fund
Price$21.85
Change-$0.44 (-1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$32.70
Change-$0.71 (-2.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.54B
IBNCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 229B vs. IBNCX (1.44B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than IBNCX: RLBEX (1.97) vs IBNCX (0.45). IBNCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: IBNCX (21 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). IBNCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. IBNCX (73.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNCX: RLBEX (250) vs IBNCX (1000). IBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.71 vs. RLBEX (2.32). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.76 vs. IBNCX (7.01).
| IBNCX | RLBEX | IBNCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.60 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.60 | 305% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.178 | -2.210 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 229B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.97 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 2.32 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.16 | 11.42 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.01 | 36.76 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.06 | 49.34 | -20% |