Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNCX vs RLBEX
IBNCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts IBNCX vs RLBEX
Macquarie Balanced Fund
Price$25.06
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.74
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
IBNCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNCX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. IBNCX (1.98B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than IBNCX: RLBEX (1.71) vs IBNCX (0.41). IBNCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: IBNCX (22 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). IBNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). IBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNCX: RLBEX (250) vs IBNCX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. IBNCX (7.62). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.72 vs. IBNCX (-1.12).
| IBNCX | RLBEX | IBNCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.59 | 293% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.59 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.162 | 14.042 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.71 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.62 | 8.98 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.54 | 41.02 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.12 | 38.72 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.81 | 73.32 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement