Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNCX vs RLBFX
IBNCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBNCX vs RLBFX
Macquarie Balanced Fund
Price$24.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.73B
IBNCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 258B vs. IBNCX (2.04B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBNCX: RLBFX (2.05) vs IBNCX (0.49). IBNCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBNCX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBNCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). IBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNCX: RLBFX (250) vs IBNCX (1000). IBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.39 vs. RLBFX (10.28). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. IBNCX (2.35).
| IBNCX | RLBFX | IBNCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.29 | 624% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.29 | 631% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.452 | 11.562 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 258B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 2.05 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.39 | 10.28 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.05 | 40.92 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.35 | 41.46 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.90 | 78.40 | 9% |