Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNCX vs RLEFX
IBNCX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts IBNCX vs RLEFX
Macquarie Balanced Fund
Price$25.23
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$38.36
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
IBNCX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNCX vs. RLEFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNCX is a Hold and RLEFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. IBNCX (2.06B). RLEFX pays higher dividends than IBNCX: RLEFX (1.97) vs IBNCX (0.49). IBNCX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: IBNCX (22 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). IBNCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). IBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNCX: RLEFX (250) vs IBNCX (1000). IBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.20 vs. RLEFX (8.33). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.28 vs. IBNCX (6.89).
| IBNCX | RLEFX | IBNCX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.39 | 464% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.39 | 469% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.294 | 12.993 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.97 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.20 | 8.33 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.81 | 51.25 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.89 | 45.28 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers