Ad is loading...
IBUY vs IYC
IBUY vs IYC Comparison
Open Charts IBUY vs IYC
Amplify Online Retail ETF
Price$63.75
Change-$0.11 (-0.17%)
Volume$122
Net Assets142.6M
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
Price$91.61
Change+$1.07 (+1.18%)
Volume$200
Net Assets1.31B
IBUY vs IYC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBUY vs. IYC commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBUY is a Buy and IYC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYC has more net assets: 1.31B vs. IBUY (143M). IBUY has a higher annual dividend yield than IYC: IBUY (-1.214) vs IYC (-5.670). IBUY was incepted earlier than IYC: IBUY (9 years) vs IYC (25 years). IYC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than IBUY (0.65). IBUY has a higher turnover IYC (11.00) vs IYC (11.00).
| IBUY | IYC | IBUY / IYC | |
| Gain YTD | -1.214 | -5.670 | 21% |
| Net Assets | 143M | 1.31B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.39 | 167% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 11.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IBUY | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBUY has been closely correlated with W. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBUY jumps, then W could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBUY | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| W - IBUY | 73% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| AFRM - IBUY | 71% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| CVNA - IBUY | 67% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| BKNG - IBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| ABNB - IBUY | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
More | ||||
IYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYC has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYC jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y