IBWC
Price
$42.00
Change
+$2.00 (+5.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
14.85M
ILPMY
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.13 (+6.13%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBWC vs ILPMY

Header iconIBWC vs ILPMY Comparison
Open Charts IBWC vs ILPMYBanner chart's image
IBW Financial
Price$42.00
Change+$2.00 (+5.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization14.85M
Permanent TSB Group Holdings
Price$2.25
Change+$0.13 (+6.13%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.37B
IBWC vs ILPMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBWC vs. ILPMY commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBWC is a Hold and ILPMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (IBWC: $42.00 vs. ILPMY: $2.25)
Brand notoriety: IBWC and ILPMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBWC: 15% vs. ILPMY: 93%
Market capitalization -- IBWC: $14.85M vs. ILPMY: $1.37B
IBWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.85M. ILPMY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBWC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileILPMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IBWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ILPMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILPMY is a better buy in the long-term than IBWC.

Price Growth

IBWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.00% price change this week, while ILPMY (@Regional Banks) price change was +10.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ILPMY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILPMY($1.37B) has a higher market cap than IBWC($14.9M). ILPMY YTD gains are higher at: 30.435 vs. IBWC (0.599).
IBWCILPMYIBWC / ILPMY
Capitalization14.9M1.37B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.59930.4352%
P/E RatioN/A4.52-
RevenueN/A413M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A948M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBWC vs ILPMY: Fundamental Ratings
IBWC
ILPMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9435
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4038
SMR RATING
1..100
7712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1298
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ILPMY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBWC (51). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (40). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBWC (77). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (54). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

IBWC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ILPMY (98). This means that IBWC’s stock grew significantly faster than ILPMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHTRX19.34N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 R6
PEQZX24.00N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Blend Z
RSIYX16.68N/A
N/A
Victory RS Investors Y
VBAIX48.75N/A
N/A
Vanguard Balanced Index I
IPSSX19.60N/A
N/A
Voya Index Plus SmallCap Port S

IBWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBWC and BPCGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBWC and BPCGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBWC
1D Price
Change %
IBWC100%
N/A
BPCGF - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVLF - IBWC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILPMY - IBWC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRGG - IBWC
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
More

ILPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILPMY and PBLOF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILPMY and PBLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILPMY
1D Price
Change %
ILPMY100%
N/A
PBLOF - ILPMY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNRV - ILPMY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - ILPMY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
CYVF - ILPMY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGBI - ILPMY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
More