IBWC
Price
$37.00
Change
-$3.00 (-7.50%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
23.89M
NACB
Price
$65.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
74.75M
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBWC vs NACB

Header iconIBWC vs NACB Comparison
Open Charts IBWC vs NACBBanner chart's image
IBW Financial
Price$37.00
Change-$3.00 (-7.50%)
Volume$574
Capitalization23.89M
NATIONAL CAP BAN
Price$65.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$104
Capitalization74.75M
IBWC vs NACB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IBWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NACB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBWC vs. NACB commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBWC is a Hold and NACB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IBWC: $37.00 vs. NACB: $65.00)
Brand notoriety: IBWC and NACB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBWC: 96% vs. NACB: 49%
Market capitalization -- IBWC: $23.89M vs. NACB: $74.75M
IBWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.89M. NACB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $74.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBWC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNACB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IBWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NACB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NACB is a better buy in the long-term than IBWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IBWC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NACB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IBWC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • NACB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IBWC is a better buy in the short-term than NACB.

Price Growth

IBWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NACB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

NACB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NACB($74.8M) has a higher market cap than IBWC($23.9M). IBWC has higher P/E ratio than NACB: IBWC (25.69) vs NACB (11.71). NACB YTD gains are higher at: 4.157 vs. IBWC (-11.377). IBWC (28.8M) and NACB (27.4M) have equivalent revenues.
IBWCNACBIBWC / NACB
Capitalization23.9M74.8M32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.3774.157-274%
P/E Ratio25.6911.71219%
Revenue28.8M27.4M105%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBWC vs NACB: Fundamental Ratings
IBWC
NACB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7141
SMR RATING
1..100
8356
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NACB's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (80). This means that NACB’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

NACB's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (71). This means that NACB’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

NACB's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (83). This means that NACB’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

NACB's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (62). This means that NACB’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

IBWC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NACB (54). This means that IBWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NACB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBWCNACB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IBWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NACB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHHYF0.050.01
+12.61%
Charbone Hydrogen Corporation
PGPHF1415.1450.69
+3.72%
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
APTL60.89N/A
N/A
Alaska Power & Telephone Co.
SZHFF21.50N/A
N/A
Sojitz Corp.
SGLMF0.40N/A
N/A
Starhill Global Real Estate Investment Trust

IBWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBWC and BPCGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBWC and BPCGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBWC
1D Price
Change %
IBWC100%
N/A
BPCGF - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVLF - IBWC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILPMY - IBWC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRGG - IBWC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NACB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NACB and IBWC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NACB and IBWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NACB
1D Price
Change %
NACB100%
N/A
IBWC - NACB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBH - NACB
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
CTYP - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGBG - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
INFT - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More