Ad is loading...
ICBMX vs TRNEX
ICBMX vs TRNEX Comparison
Open Charts ICBMX vs TRNEX
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$16.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.05M
T. Rowe Price New Era I
Price$37.18
Change+$0.40 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
ICBMX vs TRNEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICBMX vs. TRNEX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICBMX is a Buy and TRNEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRNEX has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. ICBMX (113M). TRNEX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: TRNEX (2.35) vs ICBMX (0.81). ICBMX was incepted earlier than TRNEX: ICBMX (28 years) vs TRNEX (9 years). ICBMX (1.25) is less costly to investors than TRNEX (0.57). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. TRNEX (24.30). ICBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRNEX: ICBMX (1000) vs TRNEX (500000). TRNEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.94 vs. ICBMX (-13.86). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 67.82 vs. TRNEX (63.25).
| ICBMX | TRNEX | ICBMX / TRNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.57 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.57 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.324 | -0.889 | 936% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 2.23B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 2.35 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.86 | -8.94 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.08 | 1.09 | -739% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.82 | 63.25 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...