Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICEQX vs RWEBX
ICEQX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts ICEQX vs RWEBX
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6
Price$23.96
Change+$0.12 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.81B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.23
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.88B
ICEQX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICEQX vs. RWEBX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICEQX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. ICEQX (3.81B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than ICEQX: RWEBX (0.79) vs ICEQX (0.31). ICEQX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: ICEQX (11 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than ICEQX (0.70). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ICEQX (24.00). ICEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: ICEQX (0) vs RWEBX (250). ICEQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. RWEBX (4.98). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.57 vs. ICEQX (34.35).
| ICEQX | RWEBX | ICEQX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.06 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.06 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.338 | 7.092 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.81B | 203B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.79 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 4.98 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.09 | 27.51 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.35 | 44.57 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.21 | 75.03 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement