Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICEQX vs RWEBX
ICEQX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts ICEQX vs RWEBX
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6
Price$25.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.08
Change+$0.11 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
ICEQX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICEQX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICEQX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. ICEQX (3.91B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than ICEQX: RWEBX (0.76) vs ICEQX (0.29). ICEQX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: ICEQX (11 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than ICEQX (0.70). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ICEQX (24.00). ICEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: ICEQX (0) vs RWEBX (250). ICEQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.94 vs. RWEBX (5.65). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.09 vs. ICEQX (39.85).
| ICEQX | RWEBX | ICEQX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.06 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.06 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.706 | 10.329 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 209B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.76 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 5.65 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.29 | 43.20 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.85 | 50.09 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 76.72 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement