Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICEQX vs RWEBX
ICEQX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts ICEQX vs RWEBX
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6
Price$24.25
Change-$0.24 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.78B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.54
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
ICEQX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICEQX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICEQX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. ICEQX (3.78B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than ICEQX: RWEBX (0.76) vs ICEQX (0.29). ICEQX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: ICEQX (11 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than ICEQX (0.69). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ICEQX (24.00). ICEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: ICEQX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.20 vs. ICEQX (1.28). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. ICEQX (30.34).
| ICEQX | RWEBX | ICEQX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.06 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.686 | 7.797 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.78B | 204B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.76 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 3.20 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.47 | 26.70 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.34 | 39.61 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.25 | 66.23 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement