Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICEQX vs RWMFX
ICEQX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts ICEQX vs RWMFX
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6
Price$25.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.52
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
ICEQX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICEQX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICEQX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. ICEQX (3.91B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ICEQX: RWMFX (1.42) vs ICEQX (0.29). ICEQX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ICEQX (11 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). ICEQX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ICEQX (24.00). ICEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: ICEQX (0) vs RWMFX (250). ICEQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.94 vs. RWMFX (6.50). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.62 vs. ICEQX (39.85).
| ICEQX | RWMFX | ICEQX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.706 | 10.993 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 209B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.42 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 6.50 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.29 | 46.34 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.85 | 54.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 82.96 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers