Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICEQX vs RWMFX
ICEQX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts ICEQX vs RWMFX
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6
Price$24.25
Change-$0.24 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.78B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.02
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
ICEQX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICEQX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICEQX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. ICEQX (3.78B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ICEQX: RWMFX (1.41) vs ICEQX (0.29). ICEQX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ICEQX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). ICEQX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ICEQX (24.00). ICEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: ICEQX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. ICEQX (1.28). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.78 vs. ICEQX (30.34).
| ICEQX | RWMFX | ICEQX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.686 | 8.527 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.78B | 204B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.41 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 4.02 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.47 | 29.47 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.34 | 43.78 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.25 | 72.15 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement