Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICFAX vs RPFGX
ICFAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts ICFAX vs RPFGX
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.51
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.03M
ICFAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICFAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICFAX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. ICFAX (28M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: RPFGX (1.30) vs ICFAX (0.00). ICFAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: ICFAX (15 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). ICFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). ICFAX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. ICFAX (-13.60). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.59 vs. ICFAX (-6.57).
| ICFAX | RPFGX | ICFAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.94 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.94 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.209 | 17.917 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28M | 1.12B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.60 | 12.37 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.85 | 60.08 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.57 | 89.59 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.33 | 101.51 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement