ICGUF
Price
$27.14
Change
+$2.76 (+11.32%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
IDKFF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

ICGUF vs IDKFF

Header iconICGUF vs IDKFF Comparison
Open Charts ICGUF vs IDKFFBanner chart's image
Intermediate Capital Group
Price$27.14
Change+$2.76 (+11.32%)
Volume$350
CapitalizationN/A
ThreeD Capital
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$38.07K
CapitalizationN/A
ICGUF vs IDKFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ICGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IDKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICGUF vs. IDKFF commentary
Dec 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICGUF is a Buy and IDKFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Stock price -- (ICGUF: $27.14 vs. IDKFF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: ICGUF and IDKFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICGUF: 100% vs. IDKFF: 73%
Market capitalization -- ICGUF: $5.25B vs. IDKFF: $12.72M
ICGUF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.25B. IDKFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIDKFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ICGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IDKFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICGUF is a better buy in the long-term than IDKFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICGUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IDKFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICGUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • IDKFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IDKFF is a better buy in the short-term than ICGUF.

Price Growth

ICGUF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IDKFF (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

IDKFF is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.80% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICGUF($5.25B) has a higher market cap than IDKFF($12.7M). ICGUF has higher P/E ratio than IDKFF: ICGUF (17.51) vs IDKFF (1.13). ICGUF YTD gains are higher at: 30.464 vs. IDKFF (-61.971). ICGUF has more cash in the bank: 183M vs. IDKFF (9.15K). IDKFF has less debt than ICGUF: IDKFF (84.6K) vs ICGUF (6.11B). ICGUF has higher revenues than IDKFF: ICGUF (447M) vs IDKFF (-12.81M).
ICGUFIDKFFICGUF / IDKFF
Capitalization5.25B12.7M41,323%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.464-61.971-49%
P/E Ratio17.511.131,549%
Revenue447M-12.81M-3,489%
Total Cash183M9.15K1,999,344%
Total Debt6.11B84.6K7,221,040%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICGUF vs IDKFF: Fundamental Ratings
ICGUF
IDKFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4871
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4998
SMR RATING
1..100
6051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4891
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6532

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICGUF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDKFF (53). This means that ICGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

ICGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDKFF (98). This means that ICGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

IDKFF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ICGUF (60). This means that IDKFF’s stock grew similarly to ICGUF’s over the last 12 months.

ICGUF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDKFF (91). This means that ICGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

ICGUF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (100). This means that ICGUF’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICGUFIDKFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ICGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IDKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAKGX32.260.01
+0.03%
Oakmark Global Investor
RAIIX23.01N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv I
WCEYX20.18N/A
N/A
Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund Class Y
RIBEX57.14-0.15
-0.26%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R2E
TPYAX7.99-0.03
-0.37%
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq A

ICGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICGUF and NINTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICGUF and NINTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICGUF
1D Price
Change %
ICGUF100%
N/A
NINTF - ICGUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - ICGUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - ICGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - ICGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
IVSXF - ICGUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IDKFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDKFF and SFES have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDKFF and SFES's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDKFF
1D Price
Change %
IDKFF100%
-3.77%
SFES - IDKFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.32%
IPZYF - IDKFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVSBF - IDKFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
ICGUF - IDKFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGIFF - IDKFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More