ICGUF
Price
$27.50
Change
+$1.95 (+7.63%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
5.25B
IVSXF
Price
$29.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
62.33B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICGUF vs IVSXF

Header iconICGUF vs IVSXF Comparison
Open Charts ICGUF vs IVSXFBanner chart's image
Intermediate Capital Group
Price$27.50
Change+$1.95 (+7.63%)
Volume$250
Capitalization5.25B
Investors AB
Price$29.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$879
Capitalization62.33B
ICGUF vs IVSXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVSXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICGUF vs. IVSXF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICGUF is a Hold and IVSXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ICGUF: $27.50 vs. IVSXF: $29.25)
Brand notoriety: ICGUF and IVSXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICGUF: 83% vs. IVSXF: 133%
Market capitalization -- ICGUF: $5.25B vs. IVSXF: $62.33B
ICGUF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.25B. IVSXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $62.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIVSXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ICGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IVSXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICGUF is a better buy in the long-term than IVSXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICGUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVSXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICGUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVSXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVSXF is a better buy in the short-term than ICGUF.

Price Growth

ICGUF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.63% price change this week, while IVSXF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICGUF is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVSXF($62.3B) has a higher market cap than ICGUF($5.25B). ICGUF has higher P/E ratio than IVSXF: ICGUF (17.51) vs IVSXF (4.66). IVSXF YTD gains are higher at: 10.607 vs. ICGUF (1.340). IVSXF has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. ICGUF (183M). ICGUF has less debt than IVSXF: ICGUF (6.11B) vs IVSXF (96.1B). IVSXF has higher revenues than ICGUF: IVSXF (189B) vs ICGUF (447M).
ICGUFIVSXFICGUF / IVSXF
Capitalization5.25B62.3B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.34010.60713%
P/E Ratio17.514.66376%
Revenue447M189B0%
Total Cash183M10.4B2%
Total Debt6.11B96.1B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICGUF vs IVSXF: Fundamental Ratings
ICGUF
IVSXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5080
SMR RATING
1..100
65100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
723
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICGUF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSXF (39). This means that ICGUF’s stock grew similarly to IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

ICGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSXF (80). This means that ICGUF’s stock grew similarly to IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

ICGUF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVSXF (100). This means that ICGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSXF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as ICGUF (58). This means that IVSXF’s stock grew similarly to ICGUF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSXF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ICGUF (72). This means that IVSXF’s stock grew significantly faster than ICGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICGUFIVSXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVSXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QCERX20.650.19
+0.93%
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style R6
WMFFX64.500.53
+0.83%
American Funds Washington Mutual F2
TMLCX38.200.31
+0.82%
SEI Tax-Managed Large Cap F (SIMT)
FEFAX27.950.17
+0.61%
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund A
EKGYX40.610.12
+0.30%
Allspring Special Global Small Cap Admin

ICGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICGUF and NINTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICGUF and NINTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICGUF
1D Price
Change %
ICGUF100%
N/A
NINTF - ICGUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - ICGUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
AGFMF - ICGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
ARES - ICGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
IVSXF - ICGUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IVSXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVSXF has been loosely correlated with DVDDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVSXF jumps, then DVDDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVSXF
1D Price
Change %
IVSXF100%
N/A
DVDDF - IVSXF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ICGUF - IVSXF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBARF - IVSXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVSBF - IVSXF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
IPZYF - IVSXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More