ICHGF
Price
$126.55
Change
+$9.60 (+8.21%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
19.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNOIY
Price
$33.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.17B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICHGF vs MNOIY

Header iconICHGF vs MNOIY Comparison
Open Charts ICHGF vs MNOIYBanner chart's image
InterContinental Hotels Group
Price$126.55
Change+$9.60 (+8.21%)
Volume$400
Capitalization19.09B
Mandarin Oriental International
Price$33.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$383
Capitalization4.17B
ICHGF vs MNOIY Comparison Chart in %
ICHGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNOIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICHGF vs. MNOIY commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHGF is a Hold and MNOIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ICHGF: $126.55 vs. MNOIY: $33.15)
Brand notoriety: ICHGF and MNOIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICHGF: 77% vs. MNOIY: 53%
Market capitalization -- ICHGF: $19.09B vs. MNOIY: $4.17B
ICHGF [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $19.09B. MNOIY’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $4.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $75.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICHGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNOIY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ICHGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNOIY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICHGF is a better buy in the long-term than MNOIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICHGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNOIY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICHGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNOIY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICHGF is a better buy in the short-term than MNOIY.

Price Growth

ICHGF (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNOIY (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (-3.36% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICHGF($19.1B) has a higher market cap than MNOIY($4.17B). MNOIY YTD gains are higher at: 120.318 vs. ICHGF (2.846). ICHGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.37B vs. MNOIY (-14.7M). ICHGF has more cash in the bank: 619M vs. MNOIY (155M). MNOIY has less debt than ICHGF: MNOIY (426M) vs ICHGF (4.1B). ICHGF has higher revenues than MNOIY: ICHGF (5.12B) vs MNOIY (522M).
ICHGFMNOIYICHGF / MNOIY
Capitalization19.1B4.17B458%
EBITDA1.37B-14.7M-9,333%
Gain YTD2.846120.3182%
P/E Ratio26.81N/A-
Revenue5.12B522M981%
Total Cash619M155M399%
Total Debt4.1B426M963%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICHGF vs MNOIY: Fundamental Ratings
ICHGF
MNOIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3699
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1812
SMR RATING
1..100
1189
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
573
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICHGF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNOIY (97). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.

MNOIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as ICHGF (18). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew similarly to ICHGF’s over the last 12 months.

ICHGF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNOIY (89). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.

MNOIY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ICHGF (48). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew similarly to ICHGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNOIY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICHGF (57). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICHGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICHGFMNOIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICHGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNOIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWMW38.860.18
+0.47%
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
GGLL84.29-0.45
-0.53%
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
SPIN31.52-0.24
-0.76%
State Street® US Equity Premium Inc ETF
SHDG31.54-0.34
-1.08%
Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF
VPL88.71-1.54
-1.71%
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF

ICHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICHGF and IHG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICHGF and IHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICHGF
1D Price
Change %
ICHGF100%
N/A
IHG - ICHGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
ACCYY - ICHGF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
H - ICHGF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
GHG - ICHGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
MAR - ICHGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
More

MNOIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNOIY and MAORF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNOIY and MAORF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNOIY
1D Price
Change %
MNOIY100%
N/A
MAORF - MNOIY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACCYY - MNOIY
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
HKSHF - MNOIY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACRFF - MNOIY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
ICHGF - MNOIY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More