Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs MCDFX
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs MCDFX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$15.59
Change+$0.28 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.56M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.64
Change+$0.25 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. ICHKX (26.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: MCDFX (2.90) vs ICHKX (0.90). ICHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ICHKX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. ICHKX (8.63). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: MCDFX (2500) vs ICHKX (5000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.60 vs. ICHKX (40.43). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.84 vs. ICHKX (-31.90).
| ICHKX | MCDFX | ICHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.370 | 26.550 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.6M | 99.4M | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.90 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.43 | 44.60 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.91 | 23.01 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.90 | -3.84 | 832% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.94 | 46.29 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement