Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs MCDFX
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs MCDFX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$14.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.9M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.03
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. ICHKX (25.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: MCDFX (3.08) vs ICHKX (0.96). ICHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ICHKX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. ICHKX (8.63). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: MCDFX (2500) vs ICHKX (5000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.20 vs. ICHKX (34.73). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.57 vs. ICHKX (-33.99).
| ICHKX | MCDFX | ICHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.504 | 22.055 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9M | 95.7M | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 3.08 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.73 | 39.20 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.17 | 12.35 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.99 | -6.57 | 517% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.45 | 24.20 | -118% |