Ad is loading...
ICHKX vs MCDFX
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs MCDFX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$12.16
Change-$0.16 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.42M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$11.52
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. ICHKX (22.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: MCDFX (3.57) vs ICHKX (1.01). ICHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ICHKX (31 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). ICHKX (1.82) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.30 vs. ICHKX (5.18). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: MCDFX (2500) vs ICHKX (5000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.36 vs. ICHKX (2.57). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.18 vs. ICHKX (-35.68).
| ICHKX | MCDFX | ICHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.17 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.17 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.297 | -1.778 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.4M | 93.9M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 3.57 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 16.36 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.04 | -13.19 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.68 | -7.18 | 497% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.17 | -4.35 | 1,175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...