Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs MCDFX
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs MCDFX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$14.60
Change+$0.22 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.02M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.60
Change+$0.19 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. ICHKX (25M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: MCDFX (3.26) vs ICHKX (1.00). ICHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ICHKX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. ICHKX (8.63). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: MCDFX (2500) vs ICHKX (5000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.11 vs. ICHKX (24.11). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.72 vs. ICHKX (-34.50).
| ICHKX | MCDFX | ICHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.873 | 15.918 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25M | 90.4M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 3.26 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.11 | 27.11 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.24 | 5.94 | -172% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.50 | -7.72 | 447% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.60 | 12.87 | -284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement