Ad is loading...
ICHKX vs TRCLX
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs TRCLX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$12.16
Change-$0.16 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.42M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$9.76
Change-$0.18 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.24M
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 43.2M vs. ICHKX (22.4M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: TRCLX (1.68) vs ICHKX (1.01). ICHKX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ICHKX (31 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ICHKX (1.82). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. ICHKX (5.18). ICHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ICHKX (5000) vs TRCLX (500000). ICHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. TRCLX (-1.75). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.15 vs. ICHKX (-35.68).
| ICHKX | TRCLX | ICHKX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.03 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 2.10 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.297 | -5.871 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.4M | 43.2M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.68 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -1.75 | -147% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.04 | -17.38 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.68 | -0.15 | 23,901% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...