Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs TRCLX
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs TRCLX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$15.59
Change+$0.28 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.56M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.98
Change-$0.23 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.25M
ICHKX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 59.2M vs. ICHKX (26.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: TRCLX (1.39) vs ICHKX (0.90). ICHKX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ICHKX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ICHKX (1.94). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. ICHKX (8.63). ICHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ICHKX (5000) vs TRCLX (500000). ICHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.43 vs. TRCLX (35.40). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.14 vs. ICHKX (-31.90).
| ICHKX | TRCLX | ICHKX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.03 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.370 | 22.917 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.6M | 59.2M | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.43 | 35.40 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.91 | 15.10 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.90 | -7.14 | 447% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement