It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ICL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ICL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -5.66% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -4.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.95%.
ICL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
ICL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ICL | OBOR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago70% | 10 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that OBOR and ICL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBOR and ICL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OBOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OBOR | 100% | -1.62% | ||
ICL - OBOR | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.82% | ||
ARBK - OBOR | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.88% | ||
ESLT - OBOR | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
AC - OBOR | 0% Poorly correlated | -2.51% | ||
ZIM - OBOR | -3% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
More |