Intraday BUY SELL Signals
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOP vs TKO
ICOP vs TKO Comparison
Open Charts ICOP vs TKO
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$37.75
Change+$0.44 (+1.18%)
Volume$260
Net Assets100.56M
TKO Group Holdings
Price$188.38
Change+$1.82 (+0.98%)
Volume$13.61K
Capitalization14.87B
ICOP vs TKO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOP vs. TKO commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOP is a Hold and TKO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOP | TKO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TFNS | 25.60 | 0.11 | +0.42% |
| T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | |||
| GMAY | 40.46 | 0.04 | +0.10% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - May | |||
| QUS | 170.27 | 0.04 | +0.03% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® MSCI USA StratFacs ETF | |||
| KEMX | 36.22 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF | |||
| EATZ | 24.58 | -0.16 | -0.64% |
| AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | |||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 80% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 78% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| TKO - ICOP | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.97% |
TKO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKO has been loosely correlated with NWSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TKO jumps, then NWSA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKO | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| NWSA - TKO | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| NWS - TKO | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| LYV - TKO | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| FWONA - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| LLYVK - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||