30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOP vs TKO
ICOP vs TKO Comparison
Open Charts ICOP vs TKO
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$38.10
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
Volume$200
Net Assets95.12M
TKO Group Holdings
Price$198.15
Change+$0.80 (+0.41%)
Volume$18.78K
Capitalization16.21B
ICOP vs TKO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOP vs. TKO commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOP is a Hold and TKO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOP | TKO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSDUX | 15.26 | 0.13 | +0.86% |
| Morgan Stanley Emerging Mkt ex China I | |||
| IUERX | 29.82 | 0.17 | +0.57% |
| JPMorgan International Focus R2 | |||
| EITEX | 49.21 | 0.10 | +0.20% |
| Parametric Tax-Managed Emerg Mkt I | |||
| TLACX | 12.69 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| Transamerica Large Core ESG A | |||
| ITHAX | 46.20 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Hartford Capital Appreciation A | |||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 80% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 78% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| TKO - ICOP | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.33% |
TKO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKO has been loosely correlated with LYV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TKO jumps, then LYV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKO | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| LYV - TKO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| NWSA - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NWS - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| LLYVK - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| FWONA - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||