87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOP vs TKO
ICOP vs TKO Comparison
Open Charts ICOP vs TKO
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$30.95
Change+$0.62 (+2.04%)
Volume$26.05K
Net Assets72.52M
TKO Group Holdings
Price$163.29
Change+$2.55 (+1.59%)
Volume$1.54M
Capitalization13.41B
ICOP vs TKO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOP vs. TKO commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOP is a Hold and TKO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOP | TKO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PGTRX | 74.65 | 0.65 | +0.88% |
| Putnam Global Technology R | |||
| GSROX | 14.38 | 0.03 | +0.21% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts R | |||
| FASDX | 17.52 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc A | |||
| RALYX | 10.61 | -0.04 | -0.38% |
| Lazard Real Assets R6 | |||
| KSCYX | 160.62 | -0.74 | -0.46% |
| Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Inst | |||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | +2.03% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 83% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 81% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| TKO - ICOP | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.94% |
TKO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKO has been loosely correlated with LYV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TKO jumps, then LYV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKO | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| LYV - TKO | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| NFLX - TKO | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| LLYVK - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| LLYVA - TKO | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| NWS - TKO | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||