Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICOP vs XME
ICOP vs XME Comparison
Open Charts ICOP vs XME
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$38.89
Change+$1.18 (+3.13%)
Volume$200
Net Assets94.45M
SPDR® S&P Metals and Mining ETF
Price$101.77
Change+$2.80 (+2.83%)
Volume$412
Net Assets2.98B
ICOP vs XME Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICOP vs. XME commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICOP is a Hold and XME is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 2.98B vs. ICOP (94.5M). XME has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOP: XME (75.042) vs ICOP (49.300). ICOP was incepted earlier than XME: ICOP (2 years) vs XME (19 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than ICOP (0.47). XME has a higher turnover ICOP (37.00) vs ICOP (37.00).
| ICOP | XME | ICOP / XME | |
| Gain YTD | 49.300 | 75.042 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 94.5M | 2.98B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 43.00 | 86% |
| Yield | 1.92 | 0.35 | 551% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ICOP | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 22 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -0.97% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 80% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| TKO - ICOP | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.44% |
XME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CMC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XME | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| CMC - XME | 71% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| AA - XME | 70% Closely correlated | +5.15% | ||
| KALU - XME | 69% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| STLD - XME | 69% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| NUE - XME | 68% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||