IDKFF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.71M
SFES
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.06 (-6.52%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
14.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDKFF vs SFES

Header iconIDKFF vs SFES Comparison
Open Charts IDKFF vs SFESBanner chart's image
ThreeD Capital
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.07K
Capitalization4.71M
Safeguard Scientifics
Price$0.86
Change-$0.06 (-6.52%)
Volume$136.34K
Capitalization14.43M
IDKFF vs SFES Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDKFF vs. SFES commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDKFF is a Hold and SFES is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IDKFF: $0.06 vs. SFES: $0.86)
Brand notoriety: IDKFF and SFES are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDKFF: 8% vs. SFES: 682%
Market capitalization -- IDKFF: $4.71M vs. SFES: $14.43M
IDKFF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.71M. SFES’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $14.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDKFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFES’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IDKFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SFES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFES is a better buy in the long-term than IDKFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDKFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFES’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDKFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFES is a better buy in the short-term than IDKFF.

Price Growth

IDKFF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.91% price change this week, while SFES (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFES($14.4M) has a higher market cap than IDKFF($4.71M). SFES YTD gains are higher at: 0.070 vs. IDKFF (-55.087). IDKFF has less debt than SFES: IDKFF (381K) vs SFES (1.25M). SFES has higher revenues than IDKFF: SFES (0) vs IDKFF (-19.72M).
IDKFFSFESIDKFF / SFES
Capitalization4.71M14.4M33%
EBITDAN/A-5.36M-
Gain YTD-55.0870.070-79,137%
P/E Ratio2.11N/A-
Revenue-19.72M0-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt381K1.25M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDKFF vs SFES: Fundamental Ratings
IDKFF
SFES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFES's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (70). This means that SFES’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

SFES's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (100). This means that SFES’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

IDKFF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SFES (97). This means that IDKFF’s stock grew similarly to SFES’s over the last 12 months.

SFES's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (64). This means that SFES’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

SFES's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IDKFF (100). This means that SFES’s stock grew similarly to IDKFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDKFFSFES
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAN10.22-0.07
-0.68%
Banco Santander SA
GBIO5.72-0.04
-0.69%
Generation Bio Co
PNRG172.35-2.29
-1.31%
PrimeEnergy Resources Corp
KRP13.61-0.29
-2.09%
Kimbell Royalty Partners LP
RIOT16.74-1.25
-6.95%
Riot Platforms

IDKFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDKFF and SFES have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDKFF and SFES's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDKFF
1D Price
Change %
IDKFF100%
-8.28%
SFES - IDKFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.24%
IPZYF - IDKFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVSBF - IDKFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
ICGUF - IDKFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGIFF - IDKFF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More

SFES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFES has been loosely correlated with RESCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFES jumps, then RESCU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFES
1D Price
Change %
SFES100%
-6.24%
RESCU - SFES
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IDKFF - SFES
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.28%
AHFCF - SFES
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALTI - SFES
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
TNYZF - SFES
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
More