Ad is loading...
IEFA vs IMFL
IEFA vs IMFL Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs IMFL
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$75.62
Change-$0.48 (-0.63%)
Volume$5.67M
Net Assets126.54B
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
Price$25.35
Change-$0.16 (-0.63%)
Volume$64.91K
Net Assets517.86M
IEFA vs IMFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. IMFL commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and IMFL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 127B vs. IMFL (518M). IMFL (7.964) and IEFA (7.598) have matching annual dividend yield . IEFA was incepted earlier than IMFL: IEFA (12 years) vs IMFL (4 years). IMFL has a higher turnover IEFA (3.00) vs IEFA (3.00).
| IEFA | IMFL | IEFA / IMFL | |
| Gain YTD | 7.598 | 7.964 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 127B | 518M | 24,517% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 341.00 | 1% |
| Yield | 3.04 | 3.78 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 79% | 21 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.46% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.15% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||
IMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMFL | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| BAM - IMFL | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| BHP - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| TD - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BN - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| BNS - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||