Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IEFA vs IMFL
IEFA vs IMFL Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs IMFL
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$83.42
Change+$0.25 (+0.30%)
Volume$10.96M
Net Assets140.49B
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
Price$27.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Volume$4.81K
Net Assets552.56M
IEFA vs IMFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. IMFL commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and IMFL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 140B vs. IMFL (553M). IEFA has a higher annual dividend yield than IMFL: IEFA (18.697) vs IMFL (17.152). IEFA was incepted earlier than IMFL: IEFA (13 years) vs IMFL (4 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than IMFL (0.34). IMFL has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| IEFA | IMFL | IEFA / IMFL | |
| Gain YTD | 18.697 | 17.152 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 140B | 553M | 25,316% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.34 | 21% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 156.00 | 1% |
| Yield | 2.96 | 2.96 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 78% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.05% | ||
More | ||||
IMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMFL | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| BHP - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| TD - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| BN - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| BNS - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| BAM - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||