Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IEFA vs MFDX
IEFA vs MFDX Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs MFDX
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$83.53
Change+$0.22 (+0.26%)
Volume$9.57M
Net Assets142.4B
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF
Price$35.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.11%)
Volume$55.13K
Net Assets354.14M
IEFA vs MFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. MFDX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and MFDX is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 142B vs. MFDX (354M). MFDX has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: MFDX (22.709) vs IEFA (20.990). IEFA was incepted earlier than MFDX: IEFA (13 years) vs MFDX (8 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than MFDX (0.39). MFDX has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| IEFA | MFDX | IEFA / MFDX | |
| Gain YTD | 20.990 | 22.709 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 142B | 354M | 40,113% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.39 | 18% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 29.00 | 7% |
| Yield | 3.11 | 2.86 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | MFDX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 23 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.16% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||
MFDX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFDX has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFDX jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFDX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFDX | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| BNT - MFDX | 71% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| BN - MFDX | 69% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| MFC - MFDX | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| ALC - MFDX | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| APAM - MFDX | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
More | ||||