Ad is loading...
IEFA vs MFDX
IEFA vs MFDX Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs MFDX
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$79.83
Change+$0.34 (+0.43%)
Volume$32.33K
Net Assets134.55B
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF
Price$33.63
Change-$0.21 (-0.62%)
Volume$13.66K
Net Assets331.28M
IEFA vs MFDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. MFDX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and MFDX is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 135B vs. MFDX (331M). MFDX has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: MFDX (14.648) vs IEFA (13.091). IEFA was incepted earlier than MFDX: IEFA (13 years) vs MFDX (8 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than MFDX (0.39). MFDX has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| IEFA | MFDX | IEFA / MFDX | |
| Gain YTD | 13.091 | 14.648 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 135B | 331M | 40,785% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.39 | 18% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 29.00 | 7% |
| Yield | 3.10 | 3.06 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | MFDX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||
MFDX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFDX has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFDX jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFDX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFDX | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| BNT - MFDX | 73% Closely correlated | +4.11% | ||
| BN - MFDX | 69% Closely correlated | +3.08% | ||
| MFC - MFDX | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| BAM - MFDX | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| ALC - MFDX | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||