Ad is loading...
IEFA vs QINT
IEFA vs QINT Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs QINT
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$77.76
Change+$0.96 (+1.25%)
Volume$65.05K
Net Assets128.92B
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$53.27
Change+$0.57 (+1.08%)
Volume$1.88K
Net Assets285.36M
IEFA vs QINT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. QINT commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and QINT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 129B vs. QINT (285M). QINT has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: QINT (10.182) vs IEFA (9.277). IEFA was incepted earlier than QINT: IEFA (13 years) vs QINT (7 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QINT (0.39). QINT has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| IEFA | QINT | IEFA / QINT | |
| Gain YTD | 9.277 | 10.182 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 129B | 285M | 45,263% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.39 | 18% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 78.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 3.23 | 3.23 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 77% | 17 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | +7.56% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| BMO - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| STM - QINT | 67% Closely correlated | +4.41% | ||
| BAM - QINT | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.26% | ||
More | ||||