Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IEFA vs QINT
IEFA vs QINT Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs QINT
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$83.45
Change+$0.64 (+0.77%)
Volume$28.39K
Net Assets142.97B
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$58.72
Change+$0.40 (+0.69%)
Volume$400
Net Assets383.21M
IEFA vs QINT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. QINT commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Hold and QINT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 143B vs. QINT (383M). QINT has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: QINT (23.875) vs IEFA (19.962). IEFA was incepted earlier than QINT: IEFA (13 years) vs QINT (7 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QINT (0.39). QINT has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| IEFA | QINT | IEFA / QINT | |
| Gain YTD | 19.962 | 23.875 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 143B | 383M | 37,337% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.39 | 18% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 78.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 3.19 | 2.68 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| SAN - QINT | 74% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| MFC - QINT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| NWG - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
More | ||||