Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IEFA vs QINT
IEFA vs QINT Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs QINT
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$89.00
Change+$0.16 (+0.18%)
Volume$121.67K
Net Assets157.63B
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$62.53
Change+$0.23 (+0.37%)
Volume$100
Net Assets416.67M
IEFA vs QINT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. QINT commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a StrongBuy and QINT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 158B vs. QINT (417M). QINT has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: QINT (32.329) vs IEFA (28.681). IEFA was incepted earlier than QINT: IEFA (13 years) vs QINT (7 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QINT (0.39). QINT has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| IEFA | QINT | IEFA / QINT | |
| Gain YTD | 28.681 | 32.329 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 158B | 417M | 37,890% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.39 | 18% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 78.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 2.97 | 2.50 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 12 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| SAN - QINT | 74% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MFC - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| MT - QINT | 67% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
More | ||||