Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IEFA vs QLVD
IEFA vs QLVD Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs QLVD
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$83.66
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
Volume$4.59K
Net Assets142.4B
FlexShares Dev Mks ex-US Qual Lw Vol ETF
Price$31.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$1.08K
Net Assets59.24M
IEFA vs QLVD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. QLVD commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and QLVD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 142B vs. QLVD (59.2M). IEFA (20.990) and QLVD (20.709) have matching annual dividend yield . IEFA was incepted earlier than QLVD: IEFA (13 years) vs QLVD (6 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QLVD (0.12). QLVD has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| IEFA | QLVD | IEFA / QLVD | |
| Gain YTD | 20.990 | 20.709 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 142B | 59.2M | 239,865% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.12 | 58% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 46.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 3.11 | 2.54 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | QLVD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.16% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||
QLVD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLVD has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLVD jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVD | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| BN - QLVD | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| FERG - QLVD | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| SHEL - QLVD | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| GFL - QLVD | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| SW - QLVD | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.90% | ||
More | ||||