Ad is loading...
IEFA vs QLVD
IEFA vs QLVD Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs QLVD
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$79.83
Change+$0.34 (+0.43%)
Volume$32.33K
Net Assets134.55B
FlexShares Dev Mks ex-US Qual Lw Vol ETF
Price$30.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Volume$100
Net Assets53.6M
IEFA vs QLVD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IEFA vs. QLVD commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Buy and QLVD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 135B vs. QLVD (53.6M). QLVD has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: QLVD (15.603) vs IEFA (13.091). IEFA was incepted earlier than QLVD: IEFA (13 years) vs QLVD (6 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QLVD (0.12). QLVD has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| IEFA | QLVD | IEFA / QLVD | |
| Gain YTD | 13.091 | 15.603 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 135B | 53.6M | 251,866% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.12 | 58% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 46.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 3.10 | 2.73 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IEFA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||
QLVD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLVD has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLVD jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVD | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| BN - QLVD | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.08% | ||
| FERG - QLVD | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| SHEL - QLVD | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| SW - QLVD | 33% Poorly correlated | +4.25% | ||
| AI - QLVD | 33% Poorly correlated | +5.29% | ||
More | ||||