IEHC
Price
$9.49
Change
-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
22.68M
MNBEF
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.14 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
6.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEHC vs MNBEF

Header iconIEHC vs MNBEF Comparison
Open Charts IEHC vs MNBEFBanner chart's image
IEH
Price$9.49
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Volume$1.46K
Capitalization22.68M
Minebea Mitsumi
Price$14.05
Change-$0.14 (-0.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.11B
IEHC vs MNBEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IEHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNBEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IEHC vs. MNBEF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEHC is a Hold and MNBEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IEHC: $9.49 vs. MNBEF: $14.05)
Brand notoriety: IEHC and MNBEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IEHC: 91% vs. MNBEF: 94%
Market capitalization -- IEHC: $22.68M vs. MNBEF: $6.11B
IEHC [@Electronic Components] is valued at $22.68M. MNBEF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $6.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $120.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IEHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNBEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IEHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNBEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IEHC is a better buy in the long-term than MNBEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IEHC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNBEF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IEHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNBEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNBEF is a better buy in the short-term than IEHC.

Price Growth

IEHC (@Electronic Components) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while MNBEF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

IEHC is expected to report earnings on Jun 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNBEF($6.11B) has a higher market cap than IEHC($22.7M). IEHC has higher P/E ratio than MNBEF: IEHC (23.15) vs MNBEF (13.66). IEHC (-11.721) and MNBEF (-12.187) have similar YTD gains . MNBEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158B vs. IEHC (1.32M). MNBEF has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. IEHC (10.5M). IEHC has less debt than MNBEF: IEHC (2.24M) vs MNBEF (419B). MNBEF has higher revenues than IEHC: MNBEF (1.51T) vs IEHC (28.8M).
IEHCMNBEFIEHC / MNBEF
Capitalization22.7M6.11B0%
EBITDA1.32M158B0%
Gain YTD-11.721-12.18796%
P/E Ratio23.1513.66169%
Revenue28.8M1.51T0%
Total Cash10.5M168B0%
Total Debt2.24M419B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IEHC vs MNBEF: Fundamental Ratings
IEHC
MNBEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
84100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5378
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNBEF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEHC (50). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

MNBEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IEHC (100). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew similarly to IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

IEHC's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as MNBEF (100). This means that IEHC’s stock grew similarly to MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

IEHC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MNBEF (78). This means that IEHC’s stock grew similarly to MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

MNBEF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as IEHC (100). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew similarly to IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEHCMNBEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNBEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEF6.010.07
+1.18%
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc.
EFIV59.270.47
+0.80%
SPDR® S&P 500® ESG ETF
CALI50.34N/A
N/A
iShares Short-Term CA Muni Act ETF
EBIZ30.61N/A
N/A
Global X E-commerce ETF
JDOC49.49N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF

IEHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IEHC and IBIDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IEHC and IBIDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEHC
1D Price
Change %
IEHC100%
N/A
IBIDF - IEHC
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
JPDYY - IEHC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - IEHC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - IEHC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNNDF - IEHC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNBEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNBEF and AITUY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNBEF and AITUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNBEF
1D Price
Change %
MNBEF100%
N/A
AITUY - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRSEF - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEHC - MNBEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KULR - MNBEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
JNNDF - MNBEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More