IEP vs MDU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEP is a Hold and MDU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- IEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MDU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IEP (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -5.74% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -4.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
IEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil Refining/Marketing (-4.56% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| IEP | MDU | IEP / MDU | |
| Capitalization | 7.28B | 5.14B | 142% |
| EBITDA | 150M | 868M | 17% |
| Gain YTD | -31.692 | 71.005 | -45% |
| P/E Ratio | 169.49 | 10.78 | 1,572% |
| Revenue | 11.8B | 4.66B | 253% |
| Total Cash | 5.96B | 48.9M | 12,194% |
| Total Debt | 7.21B | 2.47B | 292% |
IEP | MDU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IEP's Valuation (4) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for MDU (84) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew significantly faster than MDU’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Gas Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for IEP (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew significantly faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's SMR Rating (58) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEP (93) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEP (87) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as IEP (62) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew similarly to IEP’s over the last 12 months.
| IEP | MDU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 35% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 53% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CDC | 62.44 | 0.76 | +1.24% |
| VictoryShares US EQ Inc Enh Vol Wtd ETF | |||
| IJS | 108.86 | 0.91 | +0.84% |
| iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | |||
| DJAN | 38.96 | 0.14 | +0.35% |
| FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Jan | |||
| EFAD | 37.30 | 0.08 | +0.22% |
| ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers | |||
| XHYE | 38.52 | N/A | N/A |
| BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sctr ETF | |||
MDU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDU has been loosely correlated with MATW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDU jumps, then MATW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDU | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| MATW - MDU | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| TRC - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| NWPX - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CODI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| MLI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||