IEP
Price
$7.83
Change
-$0.15 (-1.88%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.7B
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MPC
Price
$195.52
Change
-$4.09 (-2.05%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
58.77B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEP vs MPC

Header iconIEP vs MPC Comparison
Open Charts IEP vs MPCBanner chart's image
Icahn Enterprises
Price$7.83
Change-$0.15 (-1.88%)
Volume$4.08K
Capitalization4.7B
MARATHON PETROLEUM
Price$195.52
Change-$4.09 (-2.05%)
Volume$2.08M
Capitalization58.77B
IEP vs MPC Comparison Chart in %
IEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IEP vs. MPC commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEP is a Hold and MPC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (IEP: $7.84 vs. MPC: $195.52)
Brand notoriety: IEP: Not notable vs. MPC: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IEP: 113% vs. MPC: 106%
Market capitalization -- IEP: $4.7B vs. MPC: $58.77B
IEP [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $4.7B. MPC’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $58.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $58.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $7.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IEP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMPC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MPC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPC is a better buy in the long-term than IEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MPC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPC is a better buy in the short-term than IEP.

Price Growth

IEP (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -7.67% price change this week, while MPC (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

IEP is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

MPC is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (-1.47% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPC($58.8B) has a higher market cap than IEP($4.7B). MPC YTD gains are higher at: 43.270 vs. IEP (12.318). MPC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.1B vs. IEP (550M). IEP has less debt than MPC: IEP (6.71B) vs MPC (30B). MPC has higher revenues than IEP: MPC (133B) vs IEP (9.48B).
IEPMPCIEP / MPC
Capitalization4.7B58.8B8%
EBITDA550M10.1B5%
Gain YTD12.31843.27028%
P/E RatioN/A20.80-
Revenue9.48B133B7%
Total CashN/A2.94B-
Total Debt6.71B30B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IEP vs MPC: Fundamental Ratings
IEP
MPC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
477
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10025
SMR RATING
1..100
9598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5716
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
469
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IEP's Valuation (46) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MPC (75) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew similarly to MPC’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is significantly better than the same rating for IEP (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MPC’s stock grew significantly faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.

IEP's SMR Rating (95) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MPC (98) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew similarly to MPC’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEP (57) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEP (46) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEPMPC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFSB52.33N/A
N/A
Dimensional Global Sstby Fxd Inc ETF
MUSQ27.29N/A
N/A
MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF
ERTH46.23-0.12
-0.25%
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
XLRE40.51-0.32
-0.78%
The Real Estate Select Sector SPDR®
ETHW21.08-1.28
-5.72%
Bitwise Ethereum ETF

IEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEP has been loosely correlated with CVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEP jumps, then CVI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEP
1D Price
Change %
IEP100%
-1.82%
CVI - IEP
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
CODI - IEP
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
PSX - IEP
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.83%
MPC - IEP
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
VLO - IEP
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
More