IFBD vs TAOP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFBD is a Hold and TAOP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFBD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IFBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TAOP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IFBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IFBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TAOP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IFBD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.19% price change this week, while TAOP (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
IFBD is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2022.
TAOP is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+4.57% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| IFBD | TAOP | IFBD / TAOP | |
| Capitalization | 5.75M | 2.15M | 267% |
| EBITDA | -14.72M | 5.96M | -247% |
| Gain YTD | -79.723 | -78.228 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.69 | 25.71 | 26% |
| Revenue | 5.51M | 31M | 18% |
| Total Cash | 3.39K | 460K | 1% |
| Total Debt | 3.62M | 6.8M | 53% |
TAOP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IFBD | TAOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
IFBD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and TMICF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and TMICF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBD | 100% | -1.16% | ||
| TMICF - IFBD | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MARK - IFBD | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| ADSK - IFBD | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.30% | ||
| AI - IFBD | 24% Poorly correlated | -7.40% | ||
| TAOP - IFBD | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.07% | ||
More | ||||
TAOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOP and CFCI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOP and CFCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAOP | 100% | -3.07% | ||
| CFCI - TAOP | 29% Poorly correlated | +93.33% | ||
| GEN - TAOP | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.62% | ||
| LFMD - TAOP | 25% Poorly correlated | -8.32% | ||
| EA - TAOP | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.15% | ||
| PAY - TAOP | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.46% | ||
More | ||||