Ad is loading...
IFBD
Price
$1.88
Change
-$0.16 (-7.84%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
TMICF
Price
$59.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

IFBD vs TMICF

Header iconIFBD vs TMICF Comparison
Open Charts IFBD vs TMICFBanner chart's image
Infobird
Price$1.88
Change-$0.16 (-7.84%)
Volume$52.88K
CapitalizationN/A
Trend Micro
Price$59.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
IFBD vs TMICF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFBD vs. TMICF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFBD is a StrongSell and TMICF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (IFBD: $1.88 vs. TMICF: $59.08)
Brand notoriety: IFBD and TMICF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFBD: 146% vs. TMICF: 77%
Market capitalization -- IFBD: $5.75M vs. TMICF: $6.47B
IFBD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.75M. TMICF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFBD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMICF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMICF is a better buy in the long-term than IFBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFBD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IFBD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

IFBD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.64% price change this week, while TMICF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFBD is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMICF($6.47B) has a higher market cap than IFBD($5.75M). TMICF has higher P/E ratio than IFBD: TMICF (34.48) vs IFBD (6.69). TMICF YTD gains are higher at: 49.334 vs. IFBD (-82.109). TMICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 65.3B vs. IFBD (-14.72M). TMICF has more cash in the bank: 231B vs. IFBD (3.39K). TMICF has higher revenues than IFBD: TMICF (232B) vs IFBD (5.51M).
IFBDTMICFIFBD / TMICF
Capitalization5.75M6.47B0%
EBITDA-14.72M65.3B-0%
Gain YTD-82.10949.334-166%
P/E Ratio6.6934.4819%
Revenue5.51M232B0%
Total Cash3.39K231B0%
Total Debt3.62MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMICF: Fundamental Ratings
TMICF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IARFX17.980.05
+0.28%
Invesco Real Estate R6
PGDRX11.370.02
+0.18%
Principal Diversified Real Asset R3
WIEMX3.03-0.04
-1.30%
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Instl
FSSNX28.78-0.41
-1.40%
Fidelity Small Cap Index
EXEYX16.53-0.31
-1.84%
Manning & Napier Equity Series S

IFBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and TMICF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and TMICF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFBD
1D Price
Change %
IFBD100%
-8.09%
TMICF - IFBD
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MARK - IFBD
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
ADSK - IFBD
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
AI - IFBD
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
TAOP - IFBD
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.93%
More

TMICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMICF and IFBD have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMICF and IFBD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMICF
1D Price
Change %
TMICF100%
N/A
IFBD - TMICF
32%
Poorly correlated
-8.09%
DCBO - TMICF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
MANH - TMICF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
TMICY - TMICF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
URLOF - TMICF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
More