IFBD
Price
$1.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.76M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TMICF
Price
$47.79
Change
-$5.60 (-10.49%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.5B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFBD vs TMICF

Header iconIFBD vs TMICF Comparison
Open Charts IFBD vs TMICFBanner chart's image
Infobird
Price$1.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.61K
Capitalization8.76M
Trend Micro
Price$47.79
Change-$5.60 (-10.49%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.5B
IFBD vs TMICF Comparison Chart in %
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFBD vs. TMICF commentary
Oct 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFBD is a Hold and TMICF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 20, 2025
Stock price -- (IFBD: $1.07 vs. TMICF: $47.79)
Brand notoriety: IFBD and TMICF are both not notable
IFBD represents the Packaged Software, while TMICF is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFBD: 3% vs. TMICF: 13%
Market capitalization -- IFBD: $8.76M vs. TMICF: $6.5B
IFBD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.76M. TMICF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $6.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $314.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.85B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFBD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMICF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IFBD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMICF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMICF is a better buy in the long-term than IFBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMICF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMICF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMICF is a better buy in the short-term than IFBD.

Price Growth

IFBD (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.94% price change this week, while TMICF (@Computer Communications) price change was -10.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.04%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.64% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.03% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMICF($6.5B) has a higher market cap than IFBD($8.76M). TMICF YTD gains are higher at: -17.031 vs. IFBD (-52.655). TMICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 79.5B vs. IFBD (-14.72M). TMICF has more cash in the bank: 212B vs. IFBD (3.39K). TMICF has higher revenues than IFBD: TMICF (272B) vs IFBD (5.51M).
IFBDTMICFIFBD / TMICF
Capitalization8.76M6.5B0%
EBITDA-14.72M79.5B-0%
Gain YTD-52.655-17.031309%
P/E RatioN/A30.90-
Revenue5.51M272B0%
Total Cash3.39K212B0%
Total Debt3.62MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMICF: Fundamental Ratings
TMICF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFBDTMICF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAVF116.420.45
+0.39%
MATRIX ADVISORS VALUE ETF MAVF
CCMG30.940.11
+0.36%
CCM Global Equity ETF
FTSD91.080.08
+0.08%
Franklin Short Duration US Govt ETF
DEEF34.42N/A
N/A
Xtrackers FTSE Develop ex US Mulfact ETF
GRWXF5.50N/A
N/A
MOLTEN VENTURES PLC

IFBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and TMICF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and TMICF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFBD
1D Price
Change %
IFBD100%
N/A
TMICF - IFBD
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADSK - IFBD
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
BKKT - IFBD
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.81%
ASUR - IFBD
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
PSFE - IFBD
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
More

TMICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMICF and IFBD have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMICF and IFBD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMICF
1D Price
Change %
TMICF100%
N/A
IFBD - TMICF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCBO - TMICF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
MANH - TMICF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
TMICY - TMICF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
URLOF - TMICF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
More