IFCZF
Price
$201.10
Change
+$1.21 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
35.98B
NHOLF
Price
$34.61
Change
+$3.05 (+9.66%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
29.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFCZF vs NHOLF

Header iconIFCZF vs NHOLF Comparison
Open Charts IFCZF vs NHOLFBanner chart's image
Intact Financial
Price$201.10
Change+$1.21 (+0.61%)
Volume$104
Capitalization35.98B
Sompo
Price$34.61
Change+$3.05 (+9.66%)
Volume$200
Capitalization29.53B
IFCZF vs NHOLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFCZF vs. NHOLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a StrongBuy and NHOLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IFCZF: $201.10 vs. NHOLF: $34.61)
Brand notoriety: IFCZF and NHOLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFCZF: 1% vs. NHOLF: 65%
Market capitalization -- IFCZF: $35.98B vs. NHOLF: $29.53B
IFCZF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $35.98B. NHOLF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $29.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNHOLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NHOLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NHOLF is a better buy in the long-term than IFCZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFCZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NHOLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NHOLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the short-term than NHOLF.

Price Growth

IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while NHOLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($36B) has a higher market cap than NHOLF($29.5B). IFCZF (21.29) and NHOLF (20.42) have similar P/E ratio . NHOLF YTD gains are higher at: 38.252 vs. IFCZF (10.385). NHOLF has more cash in the bank: 1.16T vs. IFCZF (19.5B). IFCZF has less debt than NHOLF: IFCZF (5.43B) vs NHOLF (694B). NHOLF has higher revenues than IFCZF: NHOLF (5.15T) vs IFCZF (24.7B).
IFCZFNHOLFIFCZF / NHOLF
Capitalization36B29.5B122%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.38538.25227%
P/E Ratio21.2920.42104%
Revenue24.7B5.15T0%
Total Cash19.5B1.16T2%
Total Debt5.43B694B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF vs NHOLF: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
NHOLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
147
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1321
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
566
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NHOLF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (66). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (21). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (100). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

NHOLF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (61). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

NHOLF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFCZF (56). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFCZFNHOLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
49%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
28%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFJKU11.25N/A
N/A
Aimei Health Technology Co Ltd
WINA479.66-0.03
-0.01%
Winmark Corp
LLYVK96.68-0.27
-0.28%
Liberty Media Corp
SHOT0.39-0.01
-3.13%
Safety Shot
OOMA12.56-0.44
-3.38%
Ooma

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
+0.61%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
More

NHOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHOLF and IFCZF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHOLF and IFCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHOLF
1D Price
Change %
NHOLF100%
N/A
IFCZF - NHOLF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
IAUGF - NHOLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSADY - NHOLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
PPCCY - NHOLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
MSADF - NHOLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
More