IFCZF
Price
$201.10
Change
+$1.21 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
35.98B
PLMR
Price
$123.20
Change
-$3.03 (-2.40%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.3B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFCZF vs PLMR

Header iconIFCZF vs PLMR Comparison
Open Charts IFCZF vs PLMRBanner chart's image
Intact Financial
Price$201.10
Change+$1.21 (+0.61%)
Volume$104
Capitalization35.98B
Palomar Holdings
Price$123.20
Change-$3.03 (-2.40%)
Volume$180.28K
Capitalization3.3B
IFCZF vs PLMR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFCZF vs. PLMR commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a StrongBuy and PLMR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IFCZF: $201.10 vs. PLMR: $123.21)
Brand notoriety: IFCZF and PLMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFCZF: 1% vs. PLMR: 50%
Market capitalization -- IFCZF: $35.98B vs. PLMR: $3.3B
IFCZF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $35.98B. PLMR’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $3.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLMR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the long-term than PLMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFCZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PLMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the short-term than PLMR.

Price Growth

IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($36B) has a higher market cap than PLMR($3.3B). PLMR (22.23) and IFCZF (21.29) have similar P/E ratio . PLMR YTD gains are higher at: 16.682 vs. IFCZF (10.385). IFCZF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. PLMR (626M). PLMR has less debt than IFCZF: PLMR (0) vs IFCZF (5.43B). IFCZF has higher revenues than PLMR: IFCZF (24.7B) vs PLMR (680M).
IFCZFPLMRIFCZF / PLMR
Capitalization36B3.3B1,091%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.38516.68262%
P/E Ratio21.2922.2396%
Revenue24.7B680M3,632%
Total Cash19.5B626M3,115%
Total Debt5.43B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF vs PLMR: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
PLMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
182
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1381
SMR RATING
1..100
9442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5667
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFCZF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMR (93) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLMR (81) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's SMR Rating (42) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFCZF (94) in the null industry. This means that PLMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (61) in the null industry. This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMR (67) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFCZFPLMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFJKU11.25N/A
N/A
Aimei Health Technology Co Ltd
WINA479.66-0.03
-0.01%
Winmark Corp
LLYVK96.68-0.27
-0.28%
Liberty Media Corp
SHOT0.39-0.01
-3.13%
Safety Shot
OOMA12.56-0.44
-3.38%
Ooma

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
+0.61%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
More

PLMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMR
1D Price
Change %
PLMR100%
-2.40%
SKWD - PLMR
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
KNSL - PLMR
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
HIG - PLMR
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
ORI - PLMR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
RLI - PLMR
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
More