Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IFED vs UWM
IFED vs UWM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IFED vs. UWM commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFED is a Hold and UWM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UWM has more net assets: 324M vs. IFED (73.1M). IFED has a higher annual dividend yield than UWM: IFED (3.294) vs UWM (-19.747). IFED was incepted earlier than UWM: IFED (4 years) vs UWM (18 years).
| IFED | UWM | IFED / UWM | |
| Gain YTD | 3.294 | -19.747 | -17% |
| Net Assets | 73.1M | 324M | 23% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | 0.95 | - |
| Turnover | N/A | 40.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.63 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| UWM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMOM | 29.22 | -0.03 | -0.11% |
| Cambria Global Momentum ETF | |||
| METV | 15.35 | -0.19 | -1.22% |
| Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | |||
| FTDS | 51.03 | -1.11 | -2.13% |
| First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | |||
| EMO | 45.86 | -1.09 | -2.32% |
| ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | |||
| SPSM | 40.82 | -1.17 | -2.79% |
| SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Sm Cap ETF | |||
UWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWM has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWM jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWM | 100% | -5.82% | ||
| FIX - UWM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| ONTO - UWM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| SMCI - UWM | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
| ELF - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.01% | ||
| MSTR - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.41% |