IFJPY vs NYT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFJPY is a Hold and NYT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNYT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IFJPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NYT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IFJPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NYT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IFJPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NYT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IFJPY (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while NYT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
NYT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-4.07% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| IFJPY | NYT | IFJPY / NYT | |
| Capitalization | 13.6B | 7.05B | 193% |
| EBITDA | 884M | 399M | 222% |
| Gain YTD | 6.754 | 12.524 | 54% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.30 | 30.62 | 99% |
| Revenue | 2.79B | 2.43B | 115% |
| Total Cash | 1.06B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.16B | 42.9M | 5,033% |
IFJPY | NYT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IFJPY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NYT (66) in the Publishing Newspapers industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NYT’s over the last 12 months.
NYT's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFJPY (85) in the null industry. This means that NYT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
NYT's SMR Rating (54) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFJPY (91) in the null industry. This means that NYT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
NYT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as IFJPY (58) in the null industry. This means that NYT’s stock grew similarly to IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as NYT (55) in the Publishing Newspapers industry. This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to NYT’s over the last 12 months.
| IFJPY | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 62% | 10 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 8 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 67% |
IFJPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFJPY | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| SCHL - IFJPY | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| PSO - IFJPY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| WLY - IFJPY | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| SBSNY - IFJPY | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.18% | ||
| NYT - IFJPY | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||
NYT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NYT and RELX have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NYT and RELX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NYT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYT | 100% | -1.83% | ||
| RELX - NYT | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| GCI - NYT | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.99% | ||
| WLY - NYT | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| SCHL - NYT | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| PSO - NYT | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||