Advertisement
IFJPY vs PSORF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFJPY is a Hold and PSORF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSORF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IFJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PSORF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IFJPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSORF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IFJPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PSORF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IFJPY (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а -4.78% price change this week, while PSORF (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.94%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Newspapers (+0.30% weekly)The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.
| IFJPY | PSORF | IFJPY / PSORF | |
| Capitalization | 15.9B | 8.98B | 177% |
| EBITDA | 468M | 1.1B | 42% |
| Gain YTD | 24.807 | -14.453 | -172% |
| P/E Ratio | 165.03 | 15.69 | 1,052% |
| Revenue | 3.89B | 3.52B | 111% |
| Total Cash | 765M | 347M | 220% |
| Total Debt | 3.86B | 1.49B | 260% |
IFJPY | PSORF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PSORF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFJPY (76). This means that PSORF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PSORF (35). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSORF’s over the last 12 months.
PSORF's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as IFJPY (95). This means that PSORF’s stock grew similarly to IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PSORF (62). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to PSORF’s over the last 12 months.
IFJPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSORF (79). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than PSORF’s over the last 12 months.
| IFJPY | PSORF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 22% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YEAR | 50.62 | -0.03 | -0.05% |
| AB Ultra Short Income ETF | |||
| CSB | 59.00 | -0.44 | -0.73% |
| VictoryShares US SmCp Hi Div Vol Wtd ETF | |||
| FMED | 24.16 | -0.25 | -1.03% |
| Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | |||
| BTCI | 56.94 | -2.01 | -3.41% |
| NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | |||
| YOLO | 3.18 | -0.15 | -4.47% |
| AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | |||
IFJPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFJPY | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| SCHL - IFJPY | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| PSO - IFJPY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| WLY - IFJPY | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| SBSNY - IFJPY | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
| NYT - IFJPY | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
PSORF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PSORF and IFJPY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSORF and IFJPY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSORF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSORF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IFJPY - PSORF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
| SBSNY - PSORF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
| PSO - PSORF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| YLWDF - PSORF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RZSMF - PSORF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||