IFJPY
Price
$24.96
Change
+$0.72 (+2.97%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
15.29B
XLMDF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFJPY vs XLMDF

Header iconIFJPY vs XLMDF Comparison
Open Charts IFJPY vs XLMDFBanner chart's image
Informa
Price$24.96
Change+$0.72 (+2.97%)
Volume$4.16K
Capitalization15.29B
XLMEDIA
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.13M
IFJPY vs XLMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFJPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XLMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFJPY vs. XLMDF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFJPY is a Hold and XLMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IFJPY: $24.96 vs. XLMDF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: IFJPY and XLMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Publishing: Newspapers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFJPY: 45% vs. XLMDF: 1%
Market capitalization -- IFJPY: $15.29B vs. XLMDF: $1.13M
IFJPY [@Publishing: Newspapers] is valued at $15.29B. XLMDF’s [@Publishing: Newspapers] market capitalization is $1.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry ranges from $15.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Newspapers] industry is $3.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXLMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IFJPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XLMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFJPY is a better buy in the long-term than XLMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFJPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XLMDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFJPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XLMDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IFJPY and XLMDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IFJPY (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а +3.65% price change this week, while XLMDF (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Newspapers (-0.65% weekly)

The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFJPY($15.3B) has a higher market cap than XLMDF($1.13M). XLMDF has higher P/E ratio than IFJPY: XLMDF (267.97) vs IFJPY (168.83). IFJPY YTD gains are higher at: 26.907 vs. XLMDF (-72.727). IFJPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 468M vs. XLMDF (-38.31M). IFJPY has more cash in the bank: 765M vs. XLMDF (24.8M). XLMDF has less debt than IFJPY: XLMDF (1.17M) vs IFJPY (3.86B). IFJPY has higher revenues than XLMDF: IFJPY (3.89B) vs XLMDF (50.3M).
IFJPYXLMDFIFJPY / XLMDF
Capitalization15.3B1.13M1,352,785%
EBITDA468M-38.31M-1,222%
Gain YTD26.907-72.727-37%
P/E Ratio168.83267.9763%
Revenue3.89B50.3M7,742%
Total Cash765M24.8M3,085%
Total Debt3.86B1.17M329,241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFJPY vs XLMDF: Fundamental Ratings
IFJPY
XLMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7238
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
9498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4897
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFJPY's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as XLMDF (90). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for XLMDF (100). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as XLMDF (98). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew similarly to XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.

IFJPY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XLMDF (97). This means that IFJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.

XLMDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as IFJPY (3). This means that XLMDF’s stock grew similarly to IFJPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFJPYXLMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFJPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XLMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVH4.140.18
+4.55%
Globavend Holdings Limited
MDIA1.350.05
+3.85%
Mediaco Holding
ERJ60.972.06
+3.50%
Embraer SA
NBTX8.700.18
+2.06%
Nanobiotix SA
DK31.32-0.60
-1.88%
Delek US Holdings

IFJPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFJPY and SCHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFJPY and SCHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFJPY
1D Price
Change %
IFJPY100%
+2.99%
SCHL - IFJPY
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
PSO - IFJPY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
WLY - IFJPY
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.18%
SBSNY - IFJPY
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
NYT - IFJPY
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

XLMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XLMDF and GWOX have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XLMDF and GWOX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLMDF
1D Price
Change %
XLMDF100%
N/A
GWOX - XLMDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RZSMF - XLMDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFJPY - XLMDF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
STRYF - XLMDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBSNY - XLMDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
More