It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFPJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRZSMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IFPJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RZSMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
IFPJF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -2.27% price change this week, while RZSMF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.30%.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
IFPJF | RZSMF | IFPJF / RZSMF | |
Capitalization | 13.6B | 411M | 3,309% |
EBITDA | 884M | 116M | 762% |
Gain YTD | 11.090 | 15.612 | 71% |
P/E Ratio | 31.06 | 7.15 | 434% |
Revenue | 2.79B | 840M | 332% |
Total Cash | 1.06B | 26.2M | 4,038% |
Total Debt | 2.16B | 193M | 1,119% |
IFPJF | RZSMF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RZSMF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as IFPJF (26). This means that RZSMF’s stock grew similarly to IFPJF’s over the last 12 months.
IFPJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as RZSMF (100). This means that IFPJF’s stock grew similarly to RZSMF’s over the last 12 months.
RZSMF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFPJF (91). This means that RZSMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFPJF’s over the last 12 months.
RZSMF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IFPJF (47). This means that RZSMF’s stock grew similarly to IFPJF’s over the last 12 months.
IFPJF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as RZSMF (42). This means that IFPJF’s stock grew similarly to RZSMF’s over the last 12 months.
IFPJF | RZSMF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago29% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago21% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago53% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago48% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago67% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago26% | 2 days ago21% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IFPJF and EDUC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFPJF and EDUC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFPJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IFPJF | 100% | -5.93% | ||
EDUC - IFPJF | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.47% | ||
DALN - IFPJF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
GWOX - IFPJF | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.75% | ||
IFJPY - IFPJF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
RZSMF - IFPJF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RZSMF and XLMDF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RZSMF and XLMDF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RZSMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RZSMF | 100% | -0.08% | ||
XLMDF - RZSMF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
IFPJF - RZSMF | 2% Poorly correlated | +3.90% | ||
PSORF - RZSMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
YLWDF - RZSMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
STRYF - RZSMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |