Ad is loading...
IFS
Price
$28.98
Change
+$0.04 (+0.14%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
87 days until earnings call
MCB
Price
$63.15
Change
+$0.59 (+0.94%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IFS vs MCB

Header iconIFS vs MCB Comparison
Open Charts IFS vs MCBBanner chart's image
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$28.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
Volume$133.08K
CapitalizationN/A
Metropolitan Bank Holding
Price$63.15
Change+$0.59 (+0.94%)
Volume$84.82K
CapitalizationN/A
IFS vs MCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFS vs. MCB commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFS is a StrongBuy and MCB is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (IFS: $28.98 vs. MCB: $63.15)
Brand notoriety: IFS and MCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFS: 84% vs. MCB: 94%
Market capitalization -- IFS: $2.77B vs. MCB: $404.02M
IFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.77B. MCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $404.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IFS and MCB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCB is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

IFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.28% price change this week, while MCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

MCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFS($2.77B) has a higher market cap than MCB($404M). IFS has higher P/E ratio than MCB: IFS (9.76) vs MCB (5.27). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 38.177 vs. MCB (14.030). MCB has less debt than IFS: MCB (547M) vs IFS (10.4B). IFS has higher revenues than MCB: IFS (6.82B) vs MCB (251M).
IFSMCBIFS / MCB
Capitalization2.77B404M687%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.17714.030272%
P/E Ratio9.765.27185%
Revenue6.82B251M2,718%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.4B547M1,901%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFS vs MCB: Fundamental Ratings
IFS
MCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
717
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCB's Valuation (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (47) in the null industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (100) in the null industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MCB (17) in the Major Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (40) in the null industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as MCB (22) in the Major Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFSMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSGUX19.210.34
+1.80%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Sm-Mid Cap Eq
FKICX12.880.19
+1.50%
Fidelity Small Cap Stock K6
CBEAX14.030.12
+0.86%
Allspring Large Cap Value CL A
DNVYX31.450.19
+0.61%
Davis NY Venture Y
DFESX14.89-0.02
-0.13%
DFA Emerging Markets Social Core Port

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
+0.14%
BAP - IFS
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
SBNY - IFS
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
MCB - IFS
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
RRBI - IFS
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
RF - IFS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
More

MCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCB has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCB jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCB
1D Price
Change %
MCB100%
+0.94%
THFF - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
EBC - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
FFBC - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
+2.41%
FIBK - MCB
76%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
CAC - MCB
76%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
More