Advertisement
BAP vs IFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Buy and IFS is a Hold.
BAP | IFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IFS's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAP (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAP’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (9) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's SMR Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (45) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (24) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.
| BAP | IFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 54% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while IFS’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- BAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- IFS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IFS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SCHM | 34.30 | 0.28 | +0.82% |
| Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) | |||
| SNSR | 49.13 | 0.30 | +0.62% |
| Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) | |||
| PFM | 54.93 | 0.05 | +0.09% |
| Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM) | |||
| CEFA | 39.85 | -0.36 | -0.90% |
| Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF (CEFA) | |||
| GOU | 24.28 | -0.90 | -3.58% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) | |||
BAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been closely correlated with IFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then IFS could also see price increases.
IFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been closely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFS | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| BAP - IFS | 76% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| BSAC - IFS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| BCH - IFS | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| CIB - IFS | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| BSBR - IFS | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
More | ||||