IFSPF vs SSD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFSPF is a Hold and SSD is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFSPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IFSPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SSD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SSD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SSD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
IFSPF (@Forest Products) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while SSD (@Forest Products) price change was -4.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
SSD is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Forest Products (-1.26% weekly)Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).
| IFSPF | SSD | IFSPF / SSD | |
| Capitalization | 736M | 8.55B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 45.5M | 554M | 8% |
| Gain YTD | -23.689 | -8.353 | 284% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.63 | 24.38 | 27% |
| Revenue | 3.34B | 2.21B | 151% |
| Total Cash | 99.4M | 430M | 23% |
| Total Debt | 914M | 552M | 166% |
IFSPF | SSD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SSD's Valuation (18) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFSPF (54) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.
SSD's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for IFSPF (87) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew significantly faster than IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.
SSD's SMR Rating (47) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFSPF (92) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.
SSD's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as IFSPF (57) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew similarly to IFSPF’s over the last 12 months.
IFSPF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSD (38) in the Building Products industry. This means that IFSPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSD’s over the last 12 months.
| SSD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
IFSPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFSPF has been loosely correlated with CFPZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFSPF jumps, then CFPZF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFSPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFSPF | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| CFPZF - IFSPF | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| WFG - IFSPF | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| UFPI - IFSPF | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| ACAZF - IFSPF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
| SSD - IFSPF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||