IFSUF
Price
$12.38
Change
-$0.31 (-2.44%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.06B
IWGFF
Price
$2.86
Change
+$0.01 (+0.35%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.82B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFSUF vs IWGFF

Header iconIFSUF vs IWGFF Comparison
Open Charts IFSUF vs IWGFFBanner chart's image
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SPA Azioni
Price$12.38
Change-$0.31 (-2.44%)
Volume$332
Capitalization11.06B
IWG
Price$2.86
Change+$0.01 (+0.35%)
Volume$35.24K
Capitalization2.82B
IFSUF vs IWGFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IWGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFSUF vs. IWGFF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFSUF is a StrongBuy and IWGFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (IFSUF: $12.38 vs. IWGFF: $2.86)
Brand notoriety: IFSUF and IWGFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFSUF: 79% vs. IWGFF: 89%
Market capitalization -- IFSUF: $11.06B vs. IWGFF: $2.82B
IFSUF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $11.06B. IWGFF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFSUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIWGFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFSUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IWGFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFSUF is a better buy in the long-term than IWGFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFSUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IWGFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFSUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • IWGFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IWGFF is a better buy in the short-term than IFSUF.

Price Growth

IFSUF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.42% price change this week, while IWGFF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +7.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +7.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

IWGFF is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+7.20% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFSUF($11.1B) has a higher market cap than IWGFF($2.82B). IWGFF has higher P/E ratio than IFSUF: IWGFF (130.00) vs IFSUF (27.55). IWGFF YTD gains are higher at: 40.033 vs. IFSUF (29.254). IWGFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.84B vs. IFSUF (950M). IWGFF has more cash in the bank: 254M vs. IFSUF (110M). IFSUF has less debt than IWGFF: IFSUF (5.05B) vs IWGFF (7B). IWGFF has higher revenues than IFSUF: IWGFF (3.69B) vs IFSUF (1.06B).
IFSUFIWGFFIFSUF / IWGFF
Capitalization11.1B2.82B394%
EBITDA950M1.84B52%
Gain YTD29.25440.03373%
P/E Ratio27.55130.0021%
Revenue1.06B3.69B29%
Total Cash110M254M43%
Total Debt5.05B7B72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFSUF vs IWGFF: Fundamental Ratings
IFSUF
IWGFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8652
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
7295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFSUF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IWGFF (97). This means that IFSUF’s stock grew significantly faster than IWGFF’s over the last 12 months.

IFSUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as IWGFF (100). This means that IFSUF’s stock grew similarly to IWGFF’s over the last 12 months.

IFSUF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as IWGFF (95). This means that IFSUF’s stock grew similarly to IWGFF’s over the last 12 months.

IWGFF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as IFSUF (51). This means that IWGFF’s stock grew similarly to IFSUF’s over the last 12 months.

IWGFF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as IFSUF (49). This means that IWGFF’s stock grew similarly to IFSUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFSUFIWGFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IWGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFRNX65.260.13
+0.20%
Janus Henderson Forty N
CDOFX49.02N/A
N/A
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
PJDAX18.65N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend A
WFDDX29.47N/A
N/A
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
NDVTX17.97N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery Value R3

IFSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFSUF and ICHIF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFSUF and ICHIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFSUF
1D Price
Change %
IFSUF100%
N/A
ICHIF - IFSUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYSNF - IFSUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IWGFF - IFSUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
HYSNY - IFSUF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A

IWGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IWGFF and VONOY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IWGFF and VONOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWGFF
1D Price
Change %
IWGFF100%
+0.35%
VONOY - IWGFF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
CIGI - IWGFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
RMR - IWGFF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
MMI - IWGFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
MNGGF - IWGFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
More