Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IGCEX vs MEDFX
IGCEX vs MEDFX Comparison
Open Charts IGCEX vs MEDFX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Debt ClassC
Price$8.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.3M
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R3
Price$12.54
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.55B
IGCEX vs MEDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IGCEX vs. MEDFX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGCEX is a Hold and MEDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDFX has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. IGCEX (21.3M). MEDFX pays higher dividends than IGCEX: MEDFX (5.26) vs IGCEX (4.78). IGCEX was incepted earlier than MEDFX: IGCEX (5 years) vs MEDFX (17 years). IGCEX (2.59) is less costly to investors than MEDFX (1.07). MEDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. IGCEX (29.00). MEDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IGCEX: MEDFX (0) vs IGCEX (1000). IGCEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. MEDFX (7.55). MEDFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.34 vs. IGCEX (9.35).
| IGCEX | MEDFX | IGCEX / MEDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.06 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.59 | 1.07 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.569 | 8.993 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3M | 7.55B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.78 | 5.26 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 7.55 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.96 | 39.03 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.35 | 12.34 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement