Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IGNAX vs PGNAX
IGNAX vs PGNAX Comparison
Open Charts IGNAX vs PGNAX
Macquarie Natural Resources A
Price$16.47
Change+$0.13 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.9M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources A
Price$56.48
Change-$0.58 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets672.67M
IGNAX vs PGNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IGNAX vs. PGNAX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGNAX is a Hold and PGNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGNAX has more cash in the bank: 673M vs. IGNAX (173M). IGNAX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: IGNAX (5.17) vs PGNAX (0.87). IGNAX was incepted earlier than PGNAX: IGNAX (29 years) vs PGNAX (35 years). IGNAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than PGNAX (1.26). IGNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. PGNAX (31.00). IGNAX (6%) and PGNAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. IGNAX (1000) and PGNAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. IGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. PGNAX (3.35). PGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 143.09 vs. IGNAX (84.69).
| IGNAX | PGNAX | IGNAX / PGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.26 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.26 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.611 | 12.190 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 673M | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.17 | 0.87 | 592% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | 3.35 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.82 | 25.20 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.69 | 143.09 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.50 | 66.35 | 26% |