Ad is loading...
IGNAX vs PGNAX
IGNAX vs PGNAX Comparison
Open Charts IGNAX vs PGNAX
Macquarie Natural Resources A
Price$14.68
Change+$0.28 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.86M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources A
Price$50.34
Change+$1.07 (+2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets633.91M
IGNAX vs PGNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IGNAX vs. PGNAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGNAX is a Buy and PGNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGNAX has more cash in the bank: 634M vs. IGNAX (158M). IGNAX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: IGNAX (5.62) vs PGNAX (0.97). IGNAX was incepted earlier than PGNAX: IGNAX (28 years) vs PGNAX (35 years). IGNAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than PGNAX (1.26). IGNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PGNAX (31.00). IGNAX (6%) and PGNAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. IGNAX (1000) and PGNAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. IGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.30 vs. PGNAX (-11.90). PGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 142.82 vs. IGNAX (78.73).
| IGNAX | PGNAX | IGNAX / PGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.26 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.26 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.291 | -3.126 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 634M | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.62 | 0.97 | 579% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.30 | -11.90 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.07 | -2.41 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.73 | 142.82 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.25 | 27.94 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...