IGPFF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
MNHVF
Price
$18.28
Change
-$0.07 (-0.38%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

IGPFF vs MNHVF

Header iconIGPFF vs MNHVF Comparison
Open Charts IGPFF vs MNHVFBanner chart's image
Imperial Ginseng Products
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
Mowi ASA
Price$18.28
Change-$0.07 (-0.38%)
Volume$108
CapitalizationN/A
IGPFF vs MNHVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MNHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IGPFF vs. MNHVF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGPFF is a Hold and MNHVF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (IGPFF: $0.06 vs. MNHVF: $18.28)
Brand notoriety: IGPFF and MNHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IGPFF: 100% vs. MNHVF: 1%
Market capitalization -- IGPFF: $9.24M vs. MNHVF: $9.17B
IGPFF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $9.24M. MNHVF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $9.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IGPFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNHVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IGPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNHVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNHVF is a better buy in the long-term than IGPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNHVF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MNHVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

IGPFF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNHVF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was -3.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (-3.66% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNHVF($9.17B) has a higher market cap than IGPFF($9.24M). MNHVF has higher P/E ratio than IGPFF: MNHVF (9.35) vs IGPFF (6.98). MNHVF YTD gains are higher at: 3.037 vs. IGPFF (-96.553). MNHVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.55B vs. IGPFF (2.22M). MNHVF has more cash in the bank: 119M vs. IGPFF (13.1M). IGPFF has less debt than MNHVF: IGPFF (0) vs MNHVF (2.19B). MNHVF has higher revenues than IGPFF: MNHVF (5.17B) vs IGPFF (5.01M).
IGPFFMNHVFIGPFF / MNHVF
Capitalization9.24M9.17B0%
EBITDA2.22M1.55B0%
Gain YTD-96.5533.037-3,179%
P/E Ratio6.989.3575%
Revenue5.01M5.17B0%
Total Cash13.1M119M11%
Total Debt02.19B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IGPFF vs MNHVF: Fundamental Ratings
IGPFF
MNHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3799
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8662
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
250
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNHVF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IGPFF (69). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IGPFF’s over the last 12 months.

MNHVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IGPFF (100). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew similarly to IGPFF’s over the last 12 months.

MNHVF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as IGPFF (86). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew similarly to IGPFF’s over the last 12 months.

MNHVF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as IGPFF (62). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew similarly to IGPFF’s over the last 12 months.

IGPFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNHVF (50). This means that IGPFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IGPFFMNHVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MNHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYOAX54.120.15
+0.28%
Rydex Biotechnology H
RIRGX72.76-0.37
-0.51%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R6
LBFIX58.16-0.38
-0.65%
ClearBridge Select I
VLLIX40.64-0.30
-0.73%
Value Line Larger Companies Focus Instl
JSCZX17.26-0.21
-1.20%
JPMorgan US Small Company R2

IGPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IGPFF and RSSFF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGPFF and RSSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGPFF
1D Price
Change %
IGPFF100%
N/A
RSSFF - IGPFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
MNHVF - IGPFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
ORENF - IGPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SALRF - IGPFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SARDY - IGPFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNHVF and MHGVY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNHVF and MHGVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNHVF
1D Price
Change %
MNHVF100%
-0.36%
MHGVY - MNHVF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
SALRY - MNHVF
16%
Poorly correlated
-7.10%
AGRI - MNHVF
13%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
LND - MNHVF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
LMNR - MNHVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More