IGPFF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
437.49K
RSSFF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IGPFF vs RSSFF

Header iconIGPFF vs RSSFF Comparison
Open Charts IGPFF vs RSSFFBanner chart's image
Imperial Ginseng Products
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization437.49K
Affinor Growers
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$590
Capitalization1.17M
IGPFF vs RSSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IGPFF vs. RSSFF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGPFF is a Buy and RSSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (IGPFF: $0.06 vs. RSSFF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: IGPFF and RSSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IGPFF: 100% vs. RSSFF: 5%
Market capitalization -- IGPFF: $437.49K vs. RSSFF: $1.17M
IGPFF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $437.49K. RSSFF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $1.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IGPFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRSSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IGPFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RSSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGPFF is a better buy in the long-term than RSSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSSFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RSSFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

IGPFF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSSFF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -9.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.44%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.83% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSSFF($1.17M) has a higher market cap than IGPFF($437K). IGPFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. RSSFF (-53.333). IGPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158K vs. RSSFF (-727.38K). IGPFF has more cash in the bank: 120K vs. RSSFF (0). IGPFF (0) and RSSFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IGPFFRSSFFIGPFF / RSSFF
Capitalization437K1.17M37%
EBITDA158K-727.38K-22%
Gain YTD0.000-53.333-
P/E Ratio2.78N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash120K0-
Total DebtN/A619K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IGPFF vs RSSFF: Fundamental Ratings
IGPFF
RSSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3785
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
17100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IGPFF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSFF (87). This means that IGPFF’s stock grew similarly to RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

IGPFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSFF (100). This means that IGPFF’s stock grew similarly to RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

IGPFF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RSSFF (100). This means that IGPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

IGPFF's Price Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as RSSFF (92). This means that IGPFF’s stock grew similarly to RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

IGPFF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RSSFF (100). This means that IGPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than RSSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IGPFFRSSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNFI28.280.36
+1.29%
United Natural Foods
ONB22.890.12
+0.53%
Old National Bancorp
ZIONP22.990.10
+0.43%
Zions Bancorporation NA
FULC6.48-0.17
-2.56%
Fulcrum Therapeutics
BTOC1.35-0.06
-4.26%
Armlogi Holding Corp

IGPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IGPFF and RSSFF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGPFF and RSSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGPFF
1D Price
Change %
IGPFF100%
N/A
RSSFF - IGPFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+13.82%
MNHVF - IGPFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORENF - IGPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
SALRF - IGPFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SARDY - IGPFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSSFF has been loosely correlated with EDESY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RSSFF jumps, then EDESY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSSFF
1D Price
Change %
RSSFF100%
+13.82%
EDESY - RSSFF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KUBR - RSSFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
MHGVY - RSSFF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
KLKBY - RSSFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SALRY - RSSFF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
More