Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHGIX vs RMFCX
IHGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts IHGIX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth A
Price$34.82
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.57B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.47
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
IHGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHGIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. IHGIX (17.6B). IHGIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: IHGIX (1.40) vs RMFCX (1.26). IHGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: IHGIX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). IHGIX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. IHGIX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IHGIX: RMFCX (250) vs IHGIX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.26 vs. IHGIX (0.33). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. IHGIX (45.35).
| IHGIX | RMFCX | IHGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.506 | 9.615 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.6B | 109B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.26 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.33 | 9.26 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.28 | 22.20 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.35 | 52.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.23 | 77.57 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement