Advertisement
IHS vs TCPFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHS is a Hold and TCPFF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IHS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTCPFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TCPFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IHS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCPFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TCPFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
IHS (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +5.86% price change this week, while TCPFF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.39%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
IHS is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+3.25% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| IHS | TCPFF | IHS / TCPFF | |
| Capitalization | 2.36B | 12.1B | 20% |
| EBITDA | 831M | 81.7B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 141.096 | 250.000 | 56% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.33 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.73B | 206B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 629M | 14.2B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 3.96B | 428B | 1% |
TCPFF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IHS | TCPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | N/A |
Advertisement
IHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHS has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IHS jumps, then S could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IHS | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| S - IHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| JLL - IHS | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| LILA - IHS | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.44% | ||
| TDS - IHS | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
| RMAX - IHS | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||
TCPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCPFF has been loosely correlated with NETLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCPFF jumps, then NETLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCPFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NETLF - TCPFF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AVIFY - TCPFF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MACT - TCPFF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHS - TCPFF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| HKBNF - TCPFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||