IHS
Price
$3.21
Change
+$0.02 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.15B
58 days until earnings call
TCPFF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.16 (-61.54%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
667.36M
Ad is loading...

IHS vs TCPFF

Header iconIHS vs TCPFF Comparison
Open Charts IHS vs TCPFFBanner chart's image
IHS Holding
Price$3.21
Change+$0.02 (+0.63%)
Volume$183.94K
Capitalization1.15B
TRUE CORPORATION PUBLIC
Price$0.10
Change-$0.16 (-61.54%)
Volume$264
Capitalization667.36M
IHS vs TCPFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IHS vs. TCPFF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHS is a Hold and TCPFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (IHS: $3.21 vs. TCPFF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: IHS and TCPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IHS: 44% vs. TCPFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IHS: $1.15B vs. TCPFF: $667.36M
IHS [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $1.15B. TCPFF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $667.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IHS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCPFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IHS is a better buy in the long-term than TCPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IHS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IHS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

IHS (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +2.23% price change this week, while TCPFF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +10.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

IHS is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+10.76% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHS($1.15B) has a higher market cap than TCPFF($667M). IHS YTD gains are higher at: 9.932 vs. TCPFF (0.000). TCPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 52B vs. IHS (-998.47M). TCPFF has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. IHS (294M). IHS has less debt than TCPFF: IHS (4.11B) vs TCPFF (402B). TCPFF has higher revenues than IHS: TCPFF (135B) vs IHS (2.13B).
IHSTCPFFIHS / TCPFF
Capitalization1.15B667M172%
EBITDA-998.47M52B-2%
Gain YTD9.9320.000-
P/E Ratio113.64N/A-
Revenue2.13B135B2%
Total Cash294M27B1%
Total Debt4.11B402B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TCPFF: Fundamental Ratings
TCPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IHSTCPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMIZX14.790.15
+1.02%
MM S&P 500® Index I
ARTNX15.970.13
+0.82%
Artisan Select Equity Investor
SIVIX17.750.08
+0.45%
State Street Instl Small-Cap Equity Inv
RIGEX36.340.13
+0.36%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R4
HGXCX15.480.04
+0.26%
Hartford Global Impact C

IHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHS has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IHS jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHS
1D Price
Change %
IHS100%
+0.63%
S - IHS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
LBRDK - IHS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
SHEN - IHS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
LBTYK - IHS
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CABO - IHS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More

TCPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCPFF has been loosely correlated with NETLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCPFF jumps, then NETLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCPFF
1D Price
Change %
TCPFF100%
N/A
NETLF - TCPFF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AVIFY - TCPFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACT - TCPFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHS - TCPFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
HKBNF - TCPFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More