Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHSSX vs WCMLX
IHSSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts IHSSX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Company R4
Price$27.00
Change+$0.22 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets611M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
IHSSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSSX has more cash in the bank: 611M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). IHSSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: IHSSX (19 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than IHSSX (1.29). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IHSSX (37.00). IHSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: IHSSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). IHSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.71 vs. WCMLX (-3.04). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. IHSSX (-20.60).
| IHSSX | WCMLX | IHSSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.309 | 1.788 | 297% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 611M | 41.3M | 1,479% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.71 | -3.04 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.94 | 21.43 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.60 | -0.83 | 2,473% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.92 | N/A | - |