Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHSSX vs WCMLX
IHSSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts IHSSX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Company R4
Price$24.94
Change-$0.05 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets602.01M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.19
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.09M
IHSSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSSX has more cash in the bank: 602M vs. WCMLX (43.1M). IHSSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: IHSSX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than IHSSX (1.29). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IHSSX (37.00). IHSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: IHSSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). IHSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. WCMLX (-2.08). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.51 vs. IHSSX (2.67).
| IHSSX | WCMLX | IHSSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.730 | -4.821 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 602M | 43.1M | 1,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | -2.08 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.56 | 26.58 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.67 | 23.51 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement