Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHSSX vs WCMLX
IHSSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts IHSSX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Company R4
Price$26.58
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets619.73M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.74
Change+$0.16 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
IHSSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSSX has more cash in the bank: 620M vs. WCMLX (45M). IHSSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: IHSSX (19 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than IHSSX (1.29). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IHSSX (37.00). IHSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: IHSSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). IHSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. WCMLX (9.59). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.52 vs. IHSSX (-6.22).
| IHSSX | WCMLX | IHSSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.404 | 6.610 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 620M | 45M | 1,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 9.59 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.88 | 21.33 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.22 | 22.52 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers