Ad is loading...
IHSSX vs WCMLX
IHSSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts IHSSX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Company R4
Price$22.18
Change+$1.91 (+9.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets498.05M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.08
Change+$1.06 (+10.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.93M
IHSSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSSX has more cash in the bank: 498M vs. WCMLX (39.9M). IHSSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: IHSSX (18 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than IHSSX (1.31). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. IHSSX (37.00). IHSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: IHSSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). IHSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.72 vs. WCMLX (-23.04). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. IHSSX (0.70).
| IHSSX | WCMLX | IHSSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.99 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.86 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.291 | -22.084 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 498M | 39.9M | 1,248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.72 | -23.04 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.58 | -15.01 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.70 | 17.47 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...