It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IIPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIRT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IIPZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
IIPZF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -0.24% price change this week, while IRT (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.14%.
IRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
IIPZF | IRT | IIPZF / IRT | |
Capitalization | 1.35B | 4.07B | 33% |
EBITDA | -123.94M | 336M | -37% |
Gain YTD | 34.838 | -10.674 | -326% |
P/E Ratio | 52.21 | 145.17 | 36% |
Revenue | 248M | 645M | 38% |
Total Cash | 3.45M | 19.5M | 18% |
Total Debt | 1.73B | 2.25B | 77% |
IIPZF | IRT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 32 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IIPZF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
IRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IIPZF (100) in the null industry. This means that IRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.
IRT's SMR Rating (91) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IIPZF (94) in the null industry. This means that IRT’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.
IIPZF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
IIPZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (26) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
IIPZF | IRT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 1 day ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago38% | 1 day ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago38% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago37% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago43% | 1 day ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago19% | 15 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago47% | 1 day ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago53% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 1 day ago55% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
RGBFX | 40.54 | 0.04 | +0.10% |
American Funds Global Balanced R5 | |||
TCEMX | 13.53 | N/A | N/A |
Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap C | |||
OPGSX | 42.41 | N/A | N/A |
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals A | |||
JVSIX | 16.59 | N/A | N/A |
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value I | |||
MVTRX | 11.76 | N/A | N/A |
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps R6 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IIPZF and PPRQF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IIPZF and PPRQF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IIPZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IIPZF | 100% | N/A | ||
PPRQF - IIPZF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
ILPT - IIPZF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
JRFIF - IIPZF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RSHPF - IIPZF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
IRT - IIPZF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
More |