It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IIPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIRT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IIPZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
IIPZF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -0.95% price change this week, while IRT (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.66%.
IRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
IIPZF | IRT | IIPZF / IRT | |
Capitalization | 1.34B | 3.83B | 35% |
EBITDA | -123.94M | 336M | -37% |
Gain YTD | 35.021 | -15.228 | -230% |
P/E Ratio | 52.21 | 136.33 | 38% |
Revenue | 248M | 645M | 38% |
Total Cash | 3.45M | 152K | 2,271% |
Total Debt | 1.73B | 2.25B | 77% |
IIPZF | IRT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IIPZF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (31) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
IRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IIPZF (98) in the null industry. This means that IRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.
IRT's SMR Rating (91) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IIPZF (94) in the null industry. This means that IRT’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.
IIPZF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (80) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
IIPZF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as IRT (31) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
IIPZF | IRT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago33% | 9 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 1 day ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 1 day ago48% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 1 day ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 1 day ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 1 day ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago22% | 1 day ago58% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IIPZF and PPRQF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IIPZF and PPRQF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IIPZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IIPZF | 100% | N/A | ||
PPRQF - IIPZF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ILPT - IIPZF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
JRFIF - IIPZF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RSHPF - IIPZF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IRT - IIPZF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
More |