Ad is loading...
IJH vs PAMC
IJH vs PAMC Comparison
Open Charts IJH vs PAMC
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Price$62.00
Change-$1.52 (-2.39%)
Volume$7.32M
Net Assets96.93B
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF
Price$45.73
Change-$1.30 (-2.76%)
Volume$9.93K
Net Assets75.46M
IJH vs PAMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IJH vs. PAMC commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IJH is a Hold and PAMC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJH has more net assets: 96.9B vs. PAMC (75.5M). IJH has a higher annual dividend yield than PAMC: IJH (-0.498) vs PAMC (-1.454). IJH was incepted earlier than PAMC: IJH (25 years) vs PAMC (5 years). PAMC has a higher turnover IJH (18.00) vs IJH (18.00).
| IJH | PAMC | IJH / PAMC | |
| Gain YTD | -0.498 | -1.454 | 34% |
| Net Assets | 96.9B | 75.5M | 128,344% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 569.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 1.28 | 0.52 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IJH | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IJH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJH has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJH jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IJH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJH | 100% | -2.39% | ||
| ITT - IJH | 81% Closely correlated | -4.03% | ||
| UFPI - IJH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| KMT - IJH | 79% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| KBH - IJH | 79% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| FBIN - IJH | 79% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
More | ||||
PAMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAMC has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAMC jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAMC | 100% | -2.76% | ||
| CR - PAMC | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| ESAB - PAMC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| VNT - PAMC | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| CNM - PAMC | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| WFRD - PAMC | 47% Loosely correlated | -6.42% | ||
More | ||||