| IJJ | TMDV | IJJ / TMDV | |
| Gain YTD | 3.936 | 1.290 | 305% |
| Net Assets | 7.66B | 4.22M | 181,708% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.35 | 51% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 21.00 | 190% |
| Yield | 1.71 | 2.85 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| IJJ | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 27 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJJ has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJJ jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that TMDV and SOLV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMDV and SOLV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMDV | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| SOLV - TMDV | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| GRC - TMDV | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
| CBSH - TMDV | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
| UBSI - TMDV | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| MKC - TMDV | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||