Ad is loading...
ILKAF
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.41 (-10.49%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
NLIBF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

ILKAF vs NLIBF

Header iconILKAF vs NLIBF Comparison
Open Charts ILKAF vs NLIBFBanner chart's image
Iluka Resources
Price$3.50
Change-$0.41 (-10.49%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$49.56K
CapitalizationN/A
ILKAF vs NLIBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ILKAF vs. NLIBF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILKAF is a Hold and NLIBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ILKAF: $3.50 vs. NLIBF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: ILKAF and NLIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ILKAF: 10% vs. NLIBF: 206%
Market capitalization -- ILKAF: $2.01B vs. NLIBF: $39.06M
ILKAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.01B. NLIBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $39.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ILKAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNLIBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ILKAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILKAF is a better buy in the long-term than NLIBF.

Price Growth

ILKAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.60% price change this week, while NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +8.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILKAF($2.01B) has a higher market cap than NLIBF($39.1M). ILKAF YTD gains are higher at: -23.414 vs. NLIBF (-61.798). ILKAF has more cash in the bank: 365M vs. NLIBF (3.88M).
ILKAFNLIBFILKAF / NLIBF
Capitalization2.01B39.1M5,143%
EBITDA647MN/A-
Gain YTD-23.414-61.79838%
P/E Ratio8.60N/A-
Revenue1.29BN/A-
Total Cash365M3.88M9,414%
Total Debt164MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ILKAF: Fundamental Ratings
ILKAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCAUX11.27-0.09
-0.79%
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund A
GEACX19.63-0.18
-0.91%
GMO Resources I
RESGX18.01-0.26
-1.42%
Glenmede Environmental Accountability
IRSSX14.42-0.21
-1.44%
Voya Russell Small Cap Index Port S
JAGCX54.76-1.45
-2.58%
Janus Henderson Glb Tech and Innovt C

ILKAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILKAF and SCCFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILKAF and SCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILKAF
1D Price
Change %
ILKAF100%
-10.60%
SCCFF - ILKAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTNDF - ILKAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMYLF - ILKAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLGF - ILKAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLIBF - ILKAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
BSRUF - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.60%
More