ILKAF
Price
$4.16
Change
+$0.06 (+1.46%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.77B
NLIBF
Price
$0.27
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
57.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ILKAF vs NLIBF

Header iconILKAF vs NLIBF Comparison
Open Charts ILKAF vs NLIBFBanner chart's image
Iluka Resources
Price$4.16
Change+$0.06 (+1.46%)
Volume$4.04K
Capitalization1.77B
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.27
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization57.43M
ILKAF vs NLIBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ILKAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ILKAF vs. NLIBF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILKAF is a Hold and NLIBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ILKAF: $4.16 vs. NLIBF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: ILKAF and NLIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ILKAF: 22% vs. NLIBF: 237%
Market capitalization -- ILKAF: $1.77B vs. NLIBF: $57.43M
ILKAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.77B. NLIBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $57.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ILKAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNLIBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ILKAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILKAF is a better buy in the long-term than NLIBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ILKAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NLIBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ILKAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NLIBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NLIBF is a better buy in the short-term than ILKAF.

Price Growth

ILKAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +6.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILKAF($1.77B) has a higher market cap than NLIBF($57.4M). NLIBF YTD gains are higher at: 47.222 vs. ILKAF (42.882). ILKAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 527M vs. NLIBF (-19.09M). ILKAF has more cash in the bank: 136M vs. NLIBF (6.64M). NLIBF has less debt than ILKAF: NLIBF (4.82K) vs ILKAF (291M). ILKAF has higher revenues than NLIBF: ILKAF (1.17B) vs NLIBF (0).
ILKAFNLIBFILKAF / NLIBF
Capitalization1.77B57.4M3,089%
EBITDA527M-19.09M-2,761%
Gain YTD42.88247.22291%
P/E Ratio14.55N/A-
Revenue1.17B0-
Total Cash136M6.64M2,047%
Total Debt291M4.82K6,037,344%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ILKAF: Fundamental Ratings
ILKAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ILKAFNLIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ILKAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EAASX33.69N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
SINAX41.62N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Large Cap Value A
APPLX16.66N/A
N/A
Appleseed Investor
GSCTX13.88N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts C
LGCFX19.49N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Global Equity F

ILKAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILKAF and SCCFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILKAF and SCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILKAF
1D Price
Change %
ILKAF100%
+1.34%
SCCFF - ILKAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTNDF - ILKAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMYLF - ILKAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLGF - ILKAF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
NLIBF - ILKAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.00%
More

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
+6.00%
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
SRCGF - NLIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
More